2013
DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3182a10fbf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrathecal Gabapentin to Treat Chronic Intractable Noncancer Pain

Abstract: Twenty-two days of intrathecal gabapentin did not demonstrate statistically significant or clinically meaningful analgesic effects. The study sponsor has no current plans for further studies. Drug-related adverse events were similar to those for oral gabapentin. Most device-related adverse events resulted from the implant surgery or anesthesia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Drugs such as gabapentin and pregabalin 200 (see Management) target the α 2 δ subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channels that are overexpressed in patients with neuropathic pain. When given intrathecally, gabapentin inhibited hypersensitivity in animal models 201 but has failed to show positive results in humans 202 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugs such as gabapentin and pregabalin 200 (see Management) target the α 2 δ subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channels that are overexpressed in patients with neuropathic pain. When given intrathecally, gabapentin inhibited hypersensitivity in animal models 201 but has failed to show positive results in humans 202 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent clinical trial failed to show efficacy of intrathecal gabapentin in patients with chronic non-cancer pain [22], in contrast to documented efficacy with systemic administration. We previously suggested that systemic gabapentin acts primarily to produce analgesia by increasing descending noradrenergic inhibition, as witnessed by increased noradrenaline concentration in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with chronic orthopedic pain who received gabapentin compared to placebo [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A focus on the spinal cord as a key site of pain transmission and plasticity after nerve injury has led to the theory that gabapentin primarily acts on spinal pain mechanisms. However, a recent clinical study questioned this theory by demonstrating a complete lack of clinical efficacy of intrathecal gabapentin in patients with chronic pain [22], despite the known efficacy of oral gabapentin in this patient population. We and others have proposed a different gabapentin’s action on descending inhibition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The antiallodynic effects of gabapentin was mediated by blocking surface trafficking of a2d1 and a2d2 heteromeric protein subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels in primary sensory and dorsal horn neurons, 26 which suggests a strong theoretical rationale for intrathecal administration of gabapentin, despite the recent failure of a phase 2 clinical trial. 31 When administered within appropriate therapeutic windows and in a slow titration, intrathecal ziconotide is recommended as a first-line option after conservative medical treatments have failed. 32 The adverse effects associated with off-target blockade of N-and T-type calcium channels may limit the effectiveness of these compounds; for example, ziconotide must be delivered intrathecally to limit the neurocognitive, psychiatric, and ataxic side effects that can be encountered with systematic routes of administration.…”
Section: Physiology and Pathophysiology Of The Primary Sensory Neuronmentioning
confidence: 99%