2006
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-011809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrathecal triple therapy decreases central nervous system relapse but fails to improve event-free survival when compared with intrathecal methotrexate: results of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) 1952 study for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, reported by the Children's Oncology Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
4
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
63
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pui et al 41 have shown that therapeutic escalation by TIT in ALL significantly reduces the risk of CSF relapse (165 patients, estimated risk 1.2%). However, Matloub et al 42 showed that, although the number of CNS relapses was lower in the TIT group relative to the group treated with simple MTX IT, EFS was similar because of more frequent bone marrow relapses in the TIT group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pui et al 41 have shown that therapeutic escalation by TIT in ALL significantly reduces the risk of CSF relapse (165 patients, estimated risk 1.2%). However, Matloub et al 42 showed that, although the number of CNS relapses was lower in the TIT group relative to the group treated with simple MTX IT, EFS was similar because of more frequent bone marrow relapses in the TIT group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Recently, however, a randomized study was performed to compare the efficacy of triple intrathecal therapy with that of intrathecal methotrexate only. 16 In that trial, triple intrathecal therapy reduced the frequency of isolated CNS relapse but unexpectedly was associated with an increased frequency of bone marrow and testicular relapse, leading to an inferior survival rate overall. One explanation for this seemingly paradoxical finding is that "isolated" CNS relapse is an early manifestation of systemic relapse, and that the better CNS control secured with triple intrathecal therapy versus intrathecal methotrexate favors overt leukemic relapse in other sites.…”
Section: Intrathecal Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 It is well recognized that the impact of many prognostic factors can be lessened or eliminated altogether with intensified treatment. For example, CNS2 status (the presence of leukemic cells in a cerebrospinal fluid sample that contains fewer than 5 WBCs/µL) was associated with an increased risk of CNS relapse in many but not all clinical trials (Table 1), [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] apparently because of differences in the efficacy of systemic and CNS-directed therapy among the study groups. Likewise, the increased risk of CNS relapse and poor event-free survival associated with traumatic lumbar puncture with blasts in cerebrospinal fluid 10,14,17 can be overcome by more effective therapy ( Table 2).…”
Section: Risk Factors For Cns Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated neurocognitive functioning in patients previously randomly assigned to IT methotrexate versus triple IT therapy on legacy CCG 1952, from which Matloub et al 8 analyzed event-free survival and overall survival outcomes. We hypothesized that triple IT therapy is associated with greater neurocognitive impairment than IT methotrexate, especially in processing speed, attention, memory, and visual motor integration, and that younger age and female sex affect the association between IT preparation and neurocognitive functioning.…”
Section: Journal Of Clinical Oncology O R I G I N a L R E P O R T V Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Children's Cancer Group (CCG) study of 1,018 patients with childhood ALL, Matloub et al 8 concluded that triple IT therapy was associated with a 6-year cumulative incidence of isolated CNS relapse of 3.4% Ϯ 1.0% compared with 5.9% Ϯ 1.2% for IT methotrexate (P ϭ .004), but the therapies had similar event-free survival rates. Interestingly, triple IT…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%