1997
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s51265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intratracheal instillation versus intratracheal inhalation: influence of cytokines on inflammatory response.

Abstract: Our laboratory has developed a method of particle exposure whereby anesthetized rats intratracheally inhale, at a regulated breathing rate and pressure, an aerosolized test material. This method is capable of delivering considerable doses in a short time period and, unlike the commonly used method of intratracheal instillation, does so with an even particle distribution throughout the lung. Early studies comparing the response of male Fischer 344 rats exposed to TiO2 particles of two differing primary particle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Silicon dioxide can cause serious lung disease, but at much higher, occupational concentrations than found in the CAPs samples in this study (41). Aluminum is generally not considered an airborne hazard; likewise, titanium-rich particle concentrations far higher than those observed in the present study are considered necessary to induce biologic responses (42,43). Indeed, titanium dioxide is often used as a negative control in studies investigating particle inhalation effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Silicon dioxide can cause serious lung disease, but at much higher, occupational concentrations than found in the CAPs samples in this study (41). Aluminum is generally not considered an airborne hazard; likewise, titanium-rich particle concentrations far higher than those observed in the present study are considered necessary to induce biologic responses (42,43). Indeed, titanium dioxide is often used as a negative control in studies investigating particle inhalation effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Different pulmonary administration routes (i.t and i.n. versus aerosol exposure) can vary the course or kinetics of the host response, subsequently altering disease pathogenesis (31,32,42). As pulmonary anthrax after exposure to spore aerosols is the most likely route of infection to be used in any future biowarfare or bioterrorist attack, the aerosol delivery system is preferred for modeling inhalational anthrax and studying host pathogen interactions.…”
Section: Vol 75 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive comparison of the two methods was made more than 15 years ago by a group led by Oberdçrster. [74][75][76] A clear description of instillation and its limitations in association with the investigation of aerosols was published in 2000. [77] One might be justified in assuming that these results have become accepted by those performing experiments on nanomaterials and expect that such studies would now be designed in accordance with these established rules.…”
Section: Lung Toxicity-instillation Versus Inhalationmentioning
confidence: 99%