1966
DOI: 10.1542/peds.37.3.403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrauterine Growth in Length and Head Circumference as Estimated From Live Births at Gestational Ages From 26 to 42 Weeks

Abstract: Charts of intrauterine growth in length, weight-length ratio and head circumference as estimated from liveborn measurements are presented. These, in conjunction with intrauterine weight charts, permit the identification of infants with unusual intrauterine growth patterns.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
2

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 921 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, drug-exposed infants had a larger mean ponderal index than nonexposed infants (0.122 greater, controlling for maternal risk factors and gestational age; see Table 7), with the effect becoming more extreme for later born infants. On the basis of norms reported by Lubchenco, Hansman, and Boyd (1966), the ponderal indexes of all of the nonexposed infants in our study and the exposed infants between 32 and 38 weeks gestation fell between the 1 Oth and 50th percentile. This indicates that nonexposed infants born at all gestalional ages and drug-exposed infants born at earlier gestational ages were relatively light for Ihcir lengths.…”
Section: Length Of Gestation and Fetal Growthsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In our sample, drug-exposed infants had a larger mean ponderal index than nonexposed infants (0.122 greater, controlling for maternal risk factors and gestational age; see Table 7), with the effect becoming more extreme for later born infants. On the basis of norms reported by Lubchenco, Hansman, and Boyd (1966), the ponderal indexes of all of the nonexposed infants in our study and the exposed infants between 32 and 38 weeks gestation fell between the 1 Oth and 50th percentile. This indicates that nonexposed infants born at all gestalional ages and drug-exposed infants born at earlier gestational ages were relatively light for Ihcir lengths.…”
Section: Length Of Gestation and Fetal Growthsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The third group consisted of consecutive full-term infants admitted to the well-baby nursery who had uncomplicated births and 1 and 5 min Apgars of at least 9 and who were matched as closely as possible to the premature groups on SES, gender, and race. Each group of infants was composed of half boys and half girls, and each was appropriate in birthweight for his or her gestational age (Lubchenco, Hansman, & Boyd, 1966).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutritional status was evaluated using two anthropometric methods: neonatal body mass index and ponderal index. Neonatal body mass index (BMI): The BMI was calculated using the formula BMI = weight (kg) / height 2 (m 2 ) [ 28 ]. To assess nutritional status based on BMI, we used our own neonatal BMI table as a reference (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neonatal body mass index (BMI): The BMI was calculated using the formula BMI = weight (kg) / height 2 (m 2 ) [ 28 ]. To assess nutritional status based on BMI, we used our own neonatal BMI table as a reference (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%