Intrauterine Insemination

Allahbadia, Gautam N.; Merchant, Rubina

doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_31

Practical Manual of in Vitro Fertilization 2012

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_31

|View full text |Cite

Intrauterine Insemination

Gautam N. Allahbadia¹,

Rubina Merchant²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 105 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Timed Intercourse versus Intrauterine Insemination with Mild Ovarian Stimulation for Unexplained Infertility

Hamid¹,

Alsayed²,

Hamed³

et al. 2022

OJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Infertility is unexplained in about 22% -28% of infertile couples. Spontaneous pregnancy may occur in them. If did not happen, Expectant management will be via clomiphene citrate (CC) administration, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and IVF & ICSI. Aim: to assess the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination with mild controlled ovarian stimulation compared with expectant management in couples with unexplained infertility more than one year. Methods: 160 couples with unexplained infertility were selected, The couples were randomly divided into two groups: Group (A) "80 couples": Intrauterine insemination (IUI) with mild controlled ovarian stimulation (combination of CC + hMG) using prepared semen and was performed 36 hours after hCG injection, Group (B) "80 couples": Couples had no ovulation induction. They encouraged for timed intercourse in the most fertile days of female cycle guided by folliculometry for 6 months. Data were collected quantitatively, coded and analyzed using SPSS. The power of study is 80% and 95% confidence interval. Result: The pregnancy rate was calculated in both groups: In group (A) (IUI/COS): OPR (Ongoing pregnancy rates) was 27.5% and PR (pregnancy rates)/cycle was 8.6%. In group (B) (Expectant management): OPR was 25% and PR/cycle was 5.3%. Conclusion: Mild controlled ovarian stimulation CC + hMG with IUI offers no statistical significance in terms of pregnancy outcomes over expectant management in this study however significance in the response to stimulation.

show abstract

Timed Intercourse versus Intrauterine Insemination with Mild Ovarian Stimulation for Unexplained Infertility

Hamid¹,

Alsayed²,

Hamed³

et al. 2022

OJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Intrauterine Insemination

Cited by 1 publication

References 105 publications

Timed Intercourse versus Intrauterine Insemination with Mild Ovarian Stimulation for Unexplained Infertility

Timed Intercourse versus Intrauterine Insemination with Mild Ovarian Stimulation for Unexplained Infertility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About