glenoid fossa, was consistent with that of Shi et al, 12 who revealed that children with sustained serious displacement or dislocation out of the temporomandibular joint fossa are more prone to treatment by ORIF. In rare cases, open reduction could also be carried out when children need treatment under general anesthesia and their parents strongly urge surgical treatment of the condylar fractures.However, carrying out rigid internal fixation is difficult for children with extracapsular condylar fractures because the children's physiological structure of cortical bone of condyle differs from those of adolescents or adult patients. The thinner cortical bone of condyle in child cannot effectively tighten the screws. 12,16 Designing the specialized fixing material may be needed for an effective treatment. Additional research is needed to verify our proposal. Analyzing the stress distribution among the fracture fragments pre/postoperative treatment is meaningful and helpful for further verification.Children that sustained extracapsular condylar fractures were highly associated with other fractures of the mandible (symphysis or body of mandible). 8 Fracture of other sites of the mandible widens the mandibular arch, leading to the abduction of condylar process (The lateral pole of the condyle or ramus stump displaced superolaterally). 13,17 Therefore, automatically reducing the condylar fragment is difficult to achieve when the mandibular width is not controlled efficiently. However, regulating the mandibular width in children is difficult under current conditions. 17 Absorbable plates are usually recommended for children due to their less risk of growth impairment. 18 However, a child fractured condyle treated with absorbable miniplate showed serious growth restriction and was followed up for approximately 4 years. Other children were followed up no more than 1 year. Therefore, followup of extracapsular condylar fractures in children should be continued until the end of growth period.We acknowledge the shortcomings in present study. The angulations were simply recorded at 158 intervals in the methods section (ie, 58, 158, 308, 458, 608, 758, 908, and À158). However, whether the same vantage point was maintained when recording separate images was unclear. CT scans are notoriously prone to patient positioning effects, which could skew the results of the study depending on how the measurements were taken. Nonetheless, in this study, the CT measurement of angulations in back view (Fig. 1) was relatively stable and accurate.On the basis of our experience, conservative treatment is a difficult procedure in restoring the height of the ramus in children with extracapsular condylar fractures. Anatomically or totally restoring the ramus height is difficult even with the surgical treatment of ORIF; however, surgical treatment of ORIF can substantially restore the ramus height for dislocated fractures or seriously displaced fractures. Additional research is needed to fully explain this phenomenon.