2010
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.193300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravascular pressure augments cerebral arterial constriction by inducing voltage-insensitive Ca2+waves

Abstract: This study examined whether elevated intravascular pressure stimulates asynchronous Ca 2+waves in cerebral arterial smooth muscle cells and if their generation contributes to myogenic tone development. The endothelium was removed from rat cerebral arteries, which were then mounted in an arteriograph, pressurized (20-100 mmHg) and examined under a variety of experimental conditions. Diameter and membrane potential (V M ) were monitored using conventional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(197 reference statements)
4
69
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter observation aligns with previous myogenic experiments using ryanodine. 10 Together, these observations indirectly suggest that α v β 3 integrins contribute to SR store mobilization and Ca 2+ wave generation, independent of L-type Ca 2+ channel activity. The preceding analysis assumes that RGD peptides have few nonmyogenic effects.…”
Section: Waves and Mlc 20 Phosphorylationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The latter observation aligns with previous myogenic experiments using ryanodine. 10 Together, these observations indirectly suggest that α v β 3 integrins contribute to SR store mobilization and Ca 2+ wave generation, independent of L-type Ca 2+ channel activity. The preceding analysis assumes that RGD peptides have few nonmyogenic effects.…”
Section: Waves and Mlc 20 Phosphorylationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Ca 2 þ channel blockers and removal of extracellular Ca 2 þ are well known to abolish the myogenic response. 43,48 This does not mean, however, that MLCP inhibition and actin polymerization are not involved in the myogenic response since cross-bridge cycling absolutely requires LC 20 phosphorylation, which generally requires an increase in [Ca 2 þ ] i . It is important to note, therefore, that any treatment or manipulation that directly or indirectly affects the activity of voltage-gated Ca 2 þ channels or Ca 2 þ influx may confound interpretation of the involvement of MLCP inhibition and dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 It was initially considered that the myogenic response is due exclusively to increased MLCK activity. 6 However, pressure elevation also evokes asynchronous Ca 2 þ waves within individual vascular smooth muscle cells because of release of Ca 2 þ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, 42,43 similarly to the Ca 2 þ waves observed during agonist-induced contraction. 44 Thus, myogenic constriction is suppressed by membrane hyperpolarization, block of voltagegated Ca 2 þ channels, removal of extracellular Ca 2 þ , or application of ML-7 (which inhibits MLCK activity).…”
Section: The Mechanosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of Ca 2þ waves in vascular SM is not fully understood, although waves in pial arteries may contribute to myogenic tone development, particularly at lower pressures. 63 In contrast, Ca 2þ sparks are highly localized, brief events activates G q -coupled P2Y receptors on the SM, leading to PLC activation. Through an as-yet-undefined pathway in parenchymal arterioles (see text for insights from pial arteries 21 ), PLC activation leads to a depolarizing Na þ influx through TRPM4, triggering Ca 2þ influx through VDCCs and leading to myocyte contraction.…”
Section: Ryanodine Receptors In Smooth Muscle: Ca 2þ -Release Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%