2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with prior studies which have shown large differences in cardioversion speed between antiarrhythmic agents [48]. Among the 6 antiarrhythmics assessed here, amiodarone is thought to be the slowest to act, with mean or median cardioversion times in the range of 8-12 h. [48,49,50] Procainamide has a median time to cardioversion of 3 h [48], while propafenone (IV) and flecainide (IV) have mean or median times to cardioversion in the range of 14-22 min. [51,52] Vernakalant appears to be modestly quicker, with median times in the range of 8-11 min.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with prior studies which have shown large differences in cardioversion speed between antiarrhythmic agents [48]. Among the 6 antiarrhythmics assessed here, amiodarone is thought to be the slowest to act, with mean or median cardioversion times in the range of 8-12 h. [48,49,50] Procainamide has a median time to cardioversion of 3 h [48], while propafenone (IV) and flecainide (IV) have mean or median times to cardioversion in the range of 14-22 min. [51,52] Vernakalant appears to be modestly quicker, with median times in the range of 8-11 min.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[38,41] While rapid cardioversion seems to translate to shorter length of hospital stay, with patients successfully cardioverting on vernakalant spending, on average, 30.8 h between admission and discharge [53], treatment-specific data on length of hospital stay among comparators is sparse. 1 It should be noted that the higher odds ratio of 33.26 for vernakalant versus placebo was dictated by odds ratios from 3 individual studies of vernakalant versus placebo [41,44,50] as well as an indirect comparison derived from a study of vernakalant versus amiodarone [40]. Odds ratios for the 3 direct comparisons of vernakalant versus placebo ranged from 24 to 28, while a vernakalant versus amiodarone odds ratio of 19 and amiodarone versus placebo odds ratio of 1.9 in the fourth study corresponded to an indirect vernakalant versus placebo odds ratio of 37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar rate of conversions (~85%) with a longer time-to-efficacy (20 versus 12 h) compared to intravenous administration was showed in a recent study [69].…”
Section: Amiodaronesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…All the studies selected (12,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) relate the intravenous administration of amiodarone when performed peripherally to the occurrence of chemical phlebitis and thrombophlebitis. T, et al (22) Am J One of them highlights that just the administration of the bolus of the amiodarone is able to increase the above mentioned complications (15) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%