Background Total knee replacement (TKA) is the most effective surgical method for end-stage knee joint disease. However, around(75%-92%)of patients after TKA are not satisfied. In the earlier days, TKA done at different times had different outcomes. Till this date, Enhanced Recovery After TKA has upgraded to a higher level. However, its safety and effectiveness concerning time have been remained unclear. So this study, we design to compare the effectiveness and safety of TKA surgery operated at different times, under ERAS.Material and method In this study, 80 patients were randomly included for primary unilateral TKA who fulfilled the study criteria, between May 1st, 2019, and November 31th, 2019 in the Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients operated and peri-operatively managed according to standard ERAS protocol. The measuring indicators include VAS score, Range of knee motion, PSQI sleep quality score, HSS knee score, operation duration, total hospital stay, anesthesia time, first urination time, hemoglobin level, hematocrit, blood loss, blood glucose, inflammatory indicators (CRP and IL-6), radiological evaluation, gastrointestinal complications, appetite, total hospitalization costs, and satisfaction.Result Out of 80 patients, 40 were operated before 2 pm and 40 were operated after 2 pm. The VAS score for knee pain on day 1 after surgery in the group before 2 pm / after 2 pm, resting (P= 0.831); motion (P = 0.877). On discharge, resting VAS (P= 0.681); motion, (P = 0.912). At 21st days VAS Score at rest (P= 0.679), At motion (P= 0.979). Before 2 pm/after 2pm group ,Blood loss(P=0.328),ROM at the 21st day after surgery (p = 0.476). PSQI at 21st days after surgery (P = 0.188), HSS knee score on the 21st day after surgery (P = 0.762), respectively. Conclusion Under the standard ERAS protocol, total knee replacements at different times do not affect its safety and effectiveness.Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR1900022256. Registered 2019/04/01