2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous ferric derisomaltose in iron-deficient patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation due to severe aortic stenosis: study protocol of the randomised controlled IIISAS trial

Abstract: IntroductionIron deficiency is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with severe aortic stenosis and may be associated with procedural and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In the Intravenous Iron Supplement for Iron Deficiency in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis (IIISAS) trial, we aim to examine whether a single administration of ferric derisomaltose can improve physical capacity after TAVI.Methods and analysisThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they were rarely evaluated for iron status, and iron therapy was believed to be underused, indicating the importance of iron supplement 3. In addition, though there has been accumulating evidence showing the limitations of oral iron therapy that may neither be adequate nor be effective compared with intravenous iron, oral iron supplementation is still currently the first-line treatment for iron-deficiency patients 32. The underuse of intravenous iron in clinical practice could possibly be explained that traditional intravenous iron cannot be applied in high doses in a single infusion due to the instability of its chemical structure and stressful damage to organs, thus repeated administration is often required, making it inconvenient for clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they were rarely evaluated for iron status, and iron therapy was believed to be underused, indicating the importance of iron supplement 3. In addition, though there has been accumulating evidence showing the limitations of oral iron therapy that may neither be adequate nor be effective compared with intravenous iron, oral iron supplementation is still currently the first-line treatment for iron-deficiency patients 32. The underuse of intravenous iron in clinical practice could possibly be explained that traditional intravenous iron cannot be applied in high doses in a single infusion due to the instability of its chemical structure and stressful damage to organs, thus repeated administration is often required, making it inconvenient for clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%