2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous N-acetylcysteine for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy: A randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Considering all the studies, neither oral nor intravenous NAC should be routinely prescribed for CIN prophylaxis. 26,27 As reported in many studies, we also found that NAC did not confer any benefit over saline alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…25 Considering all the studies, neither oral nor intravenous NAC should be routinely prescribed for CIN prophylaxis. 26,27 As reported in many studies, we also found that NAC did not confer any benefit over saline alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The relationship between COL toxicity and cumulative dose has been demonstrated in previous reports [15,16]. The cumulative COL dose, as well as the duration of COL use, were all higher in the NAC+COL group, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.802, p = 0.447).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The summary OR for CIN associated with the use of NAC was essentially unchanged at 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.96, p ¼ 0.02), and substantial heterogeneity reduced obviously (p ¼ 0.12, I 2 ¼ 29%). And, in the DM group, after excluding the studies of Carbonell et al, 34 Coyle et al 33 or Rashid et al 30 in which patients with diabetes regardless of renal function, the OR remained insignificant of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.47-1.16, p ¼ 0. 19) and heterogeneity reduced obviously (p ¼ 0.54, I…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%