2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous or oral administration of vinorelbine in adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine for resected NSCLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical treatment for lung cancer involves oral or intravenous administration of antifungal drug formulations [13]. However, these compounds have many side effects and are not very effective [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical treatment for lung cancer involves oral or intravenous administration of antifungal drug formulations [13]. However, these compounds have many side effects and are not very effective [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline of IC 50 values with the prolonged incubation time is shown in Figure 1. At the same concentration, the proliferation inhibitory activity of 5e was superior to 7-HC, even though neither of them are comparable with cisplatin which has been extensively used to treat patients with NSCLC within the last several decades [23,24,25]. The above results suggest that compound 5e can induce a dose- and time-dependent proliferation inhibition of A549 and NCI-H460 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This can be one of the reasons for preference of CBDCA in real-world studies performed in Canada and United States [26,27]. Only one retrospective study exists in which oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m 2 (Day 1 and 8) was used with CDDP 75 mg/m 2 every three weeks in the adjuvant setting [28]. Non-statistical differences comparing parenteral administration of vinorelbine were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%