“…The improved accuracy at lower dabigatran concentration is most likely secondary to calibration methods, as ECA‐T calibration used 3‐4 points (0 [optional], 30, 255, and 468 ng/mL) and ECA‐II had a fivepoint calibration curve (0, 52, 106, 182, and 270 ng/mL). These data, coupled with the protocol changes (Table 1) would suggest that protocol modifications are required to cover the entire testing range, but no change may be necessary if accuracy is more clinically relevant at lower dabigatran concentrations (<50 ng/mL) for cases of emergent interventions 43,44 . In addition, the methodology of Diagnostica Stago for the ECA‐II assay uses reflex testing meaning that, when the concentration is above the higher calibration point, an automatic re‐dilution of the samples is performed by the analyzer (from 1/5 in the initial analysis to 1/15 in the re‐diluted analysis, increasing the potential range of measurement until 750 ng/mL approximatively).…”