1983
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.140.3.425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous vs. left ventricular injection of ionic contrast material: hemodynamic implications for digital subtraction angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The haemodynamic effects of contrast media have been evaluated in several experimental and clinical studies (2,3,20,22,27,30). The results of these studies are not in all aspects comparable with each other or with findings in the present study because of different types and amounts of contrast media injected, different sites and rates of injection and because different haemodynamic variables were measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The haemodynamic effects of contrast media have been evaluated in several experimental and clinical studies (2,3,20,22,27,30). The results of these studies are not in all aspects comparable with each other or with findings in the present study because of different types and amounts of contrast media injected, different sites and rates of injection and because different haemodynamic variables were measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…There might be some concerns with respect to angiographic workup because of past reports of deleterious changes of pulmonary circulation in such patients, including considerable deterioration of right heart hemodynamics and fatality during contrast injections [8][9][10][11][12]. However, these older contrast media have been replaced by newer and safer ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators have observed that contrast material increases pulmonary artery pressure via a large increase in cardiac output resulting from decreased systemic vascular resistance, in spite of a concomitant decrease in PVR [25,26]. Others, however, have observed that the increased pulmonary artery pressure was due to a sustained increase in PVR after an immediate initial decrease in PVR [27].…”
Section: Pulmonary Artery Hemodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%