2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: A One-year Prospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
112
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
112
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Easy access and relatively low cost have caused it to be widely used for the treatment of neovascular eye diseases. Bevacizumab seems to have yielded similar results, when compared to ranibizumab, regarding visual stabilization and recovery in neovascular AMD, but its use is still considered off-label (9)(10)(11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Easy access and relatively low cost have caused it to be widely used for the treatment of neovascular eye diseases. Bevacizumab seems to have yielded similar results, when compared to ranibizumab, regarding visual stabilization and recovery in neovascular AMD, but its use is still considered off-label (9)(10)(11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The observed increase in VA is also closely similar to the increase of 10.8 ETDRS letters after ranibizumab three times and additional injections when necessary based on OCT and VA change [21]. It is interesting to see that in the 1-year follow-up study of Bashur et al, fewer injections were needed than in the 1-year follow-up study on ranibizumab of Fung et al, with almost the same criteria for reinjection, knowing that the intravenous half-life of bevacizumab is 150% that of ranibizumab in rabbit eyes [5,6,8,21]. However, the dosage in Bashur's study was 2.5 mg bevacizumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 In addition, the effectiveness of intravitreously injected VEGF inhibitors has been analysed in clinical studies. [20][21][22][23] However, the results of all the different therapeutic procedures have not been compared up to now. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the data of 328 patients suffering from exudative AMD with serous PED who received different treatment procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%