2016
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intricate Assessment and Evaluation of Effect of Bruxism on Long-term Survival and Failure of Dental Implants: A Comparative Study

Abstract: For the long-term clinical success and survival of dental implants in patients, special emphasis should be given on the patient's deleterious oral habits, such as bruxism as in long run, they influence the stability of dental implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results, they concluded that increased risk of dental implant failure is associated with bruxism. Yadav et al 15 evaluated the complications associated with dental implants in bruxers. They analyzed a total of 1,100 patients, who underwent prosthetic rehabilitation by dental implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results, they concluded that increased risk of dental implant failure is associated with bruxism. Yadav et al 15 evaluated the complications associated with dental implants in bruxers. They analyzed a total of 1,100 patients, who underwent prosthetic rehabilitation by dental implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental attrition, abfraction, and occlusal pits on natural teeth have been documented in patients with self-reported parafunctions. Many authors suggested that oral parafunctions represent a risk factor for marginal bone loss around implants and implant failure [3740]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12,13,14,15 There are limitations in the evidence base, regarding the direct causality of occlusal overload and implant marginal bone loss, but researchers acknowledge an association. 16,17,18,19,20,21 The articles raising an objection to this statement do not present a conflicting view. The review by Naert et al 22 was inconclusive, with Afrashtefar 23 and Bertolini 24 only reporting on animal studies and Afrashtefar indicating bias and heterogeneity.…”
Section: Letters To the Editormentioning
confidence: 97%