2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/devlrn.2011.6037375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic Activitity: from motor babbling to play

Abstract: This paper presents the hypothesis that intrin sic, apparently goal-free, motor-centric activity is a funda mental and necessary component of cognitive development in truly autonomous intelligent agents, both human and artificial.We argue that such intrinsic activity is the source of both early motor babbling behaviour and the much more complex play behaviours of older children (and even adults). We also show how babbling/play may be implemented as a form of unsupervised shaping.These ideas are a consequence o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many useful models of body babbling that have been proposed as of late in the robotics literature Lee (2011), making new advances in solving the inverse problems involved in motor planning (Rolf et al, 2010) and representation issues in sensorimotor representations (Law et al, 2013). We view our model as a simplified form of model for body babbling that allows us to ask what kind of impact it has on evolution of animals that engage in it and robots that use genetic algorithms combined with body babbling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been many useful models of body babbling that have been proposed as of late in the robotics literature Lee (2011), making new advances in solving the inverse problems involved in motor planning (Rolf et al, 2010) and representation issues in sensorimotor representations (Law et al, 2013). We view our model as a simplified form of model for body babbling that allows us to ask what kind of impact it has on evolution of animals that engage in it and robots that use genetic algorithms combined with body babbling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the MWUA model assumes there are internal reward signals associated with different motor behaviors, and that the ones which are closer to goal-directed are internally rewarded this way. So too does Lee (2011) emphasize the importance of internal rewards and intrinsic motivation as a way to model play, with the latter originally introduced by Furth (1969). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our work focus on using the “Play” strategy to create the mobile reaching ability for our robot, with the two game modes created. Our system not only involves spontaneous and intrinsically motivated exploration of actions and objects in varying contexts (Lee, 2011 ) but also, contains developmental characteristic by applying the “LCAS” developmental learning algorithm. Without setting specific goals, the robot uses its learning status to develop from the simple game mode to the complex one.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rich behaviour can emerge from physical (or virtual) constraints and fundamental low level mechanisms. For example, intrinsic goal free motor activity which underlies babbling may lay an essential foundation for play and cognitive development [Lee 2011]. Intrinsically motivated behaviour has arguably been demonstrated in biologically based models of action discovery [Gurney et al 2013].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a specialized circuit for vocal babbling has been discovered in the Songbird [Aronov et al 2008]) and it is argued that babbling is a fundamental to cognitive development in autonomous intelligent agents [Lee 2011]. In the model, motor babbling is produced by a specialized recurrent neural network which forms part of the basal ganglia thalamic circuit [Goldberg and Fee 2011].…”
Section: Example: Facial Mimicrymentioning
confidence: 99%