2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic activity and comparative molecular dynamics of buspirone analogues at the 5-HT1A receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional set of 40 5-HT 1A receptor ligands (arylpiperazines, indoles and tetralines; see the Supporting Information) with a putative binding mode proposed in the literature , ,,, were docked to the top-scoring ensemble of pockets. The binding modes were analyzed using SIFt methodology. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional set of 40 5-HT 1A receptor ligands (arylpiperazines, indoles and tetralines; see the Supporting Information) with a putative binding mode proposed in the literature , ,,, were docked to the top-scoring ensemble of pockets. The binding modes were analyzed using SIFt methodology. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular mechanisms and structural events that occur at the receptor leading to pre-and post-synaptic activity however are not understood. Additional information regarding these mechanisms is crucial for design of drugs that can act selectively at pre-or post-synaptic 5-HT 1A receptors (Strzelczyk et al, 2004).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the computational experiments done so far on GPCRs concerned ligand binding site identification and predictions of the ligand interaction modes for either qualitative or quantitative structure affinity/selectivity relationships and drug design (reviewed also in refs and −479). In contrast, very few computational studies have been aimed at investigating the structural changes induced by agonists into receptor portions more or less distal from the ligand binding site. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, The results of these studies are reviewed in a separate section.…”
Section: 3 Computational Modeling Of Ligand−receptor Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%