2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic and maternal traits influence personality during early life in Galápagos sea lion, Zalophus wollebaeki, pups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal personality is defined as consistent among-individual differences in behaviour which persist through time and in different contexts (Carter et al, 2013;Koski, 2014;Réale et al, 2007) and is commonly described by several underlying personality traits, each of which reflects a particular aspect of an individual's behavioural repertoire (Carter et al, 2013;Réale et al, 2007). Personality has been documented across taxa in several recent studies (insects: Crall et al, 2018;fish: Barber et al, 2017;Jolles et al, 2019;reptiles: Horváth et al, 2019;Michelangeli et al, 2019;birds: Morinay et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2019;mammals: Brehm et al, 2019;DeRango et al, 2019;Petelle et al, 2019), and personality traits such as activity (Michelangeli et al, 2019), exploration (Arvidsson et al, 2017) and boldness-shyness (Jolly et al, 2019;Perals et al, 2017) have been quantified using different methods under laboratory conditions and in free-living populations in the wild (Krebs et al, 2019;Réale et al, 2007;Šlipogor et al, 2020;Tkaczynski et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal personality is defined as consistent among-individual differences in behaviour which persist through time and in different contexts (Carter et al, 2013;Koski, 2014;Réale et al, 2007) and is commonly described by several underlying personality traits, each of which reflects a particular aspect of an individual's behavioural repertoire (Carter et al, 2013;Réale et al, 2007). Personality has been documented across taxa in several recent studies (insects: Crall et al, 2018;fish: Barber et al, 2017;Jolles et al, 2019;reptiles: Horváth et al, 2019;Michelangeli et al, 2019;birds: Morinay et al, 2019;Richardson et al, 2019;mammals: Brehm et al, 2019;DeRango et al, 2019;Petelle et al, 2019), and personality traits such as activity (Michelangeli et al, 2019), exploration (Arvidsson et al, 2017) and boldness-shyness (Jolly et al, 2019;Perals et al, 2017) have been quantified using different methods under laboratory conditions and in free-living populations in the wild (Krebs et al, 2019;Réale et al, 2007;Šlipogor et al, 2020;Tkaczynski et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For females with measures of resting HRV for more than one season (Table 3) we determined population level repeatability (R 86,87 ) using the 'rptR' package 88 with individual as a random effect and the number of measures per individuals as a fixed effect, with parametric bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals computed from 1,000 simulations. We also derived repeatability estimates for every individual (Ri) by dividing the between-individual variance (σ2α) by the sum of between-individual variance and the residual variance for each individual 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As behavioural expression is often context dependent, patterns of inter-individual variation expressed in arguably abstract laboratory conditions or under acute stress may not always be expressed in the range of natural conditions a species experiences 14,15 , though see 16 . Thus, an increasing number of studies are attempting to assess personality and its consequences in natural wild settings, where inter-individual variation will have its ecologically and evolutionary relevant consequences 14,[17][18][19][20] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach stopped, either when the sea lion began moving toward the observer, or when the observer came within 2 m of the sea lion -the Galápagos National Park's minimum required distance from wildlife. Finally, the observer rated the sea lion's reaction to their approach on a scale of 0-5, with scores of 4 and 5 representing aggressive reactions: 0: the sea lion's eyes were closed (possibly asleep) and the sea lion did not react 1: the sea lion's eyes were open and the sea lion did not react 2: the sea lion lifted/moved its head to look at the observer 3: the sea lion moved away from the observer 4: the sea lion vocalized (growl or bark) 5: the sea lion moved toward the observer This 0-5 scale is an adaptation of the scales used to measure behavioral responses to human approach in squirrels (Cooper et al 2008), polar bears (Dyck and Baydack 2004) and sea lions (Orsini et al 2006, DeRango et al 2019.…”
Section: Approach Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%