2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites

Abstract: SUMMARY Transcription factors bind to their binding sites over a wide range of affinities, yet how differences in affinity are encoded in DNA sequences is not well understood. Here, we report X-ray crystal structures of four heterodimers of the Hox protein AbdominalB bound with its cofactor Extradenticle to four target DNA molecules that differ in affinity by up to ~20-fold. Remarkably, despite large differences in affinity, the overall structures are very similar in all four complexes. In contrast, the predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(80 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the bases at this position have a significant influence on the local DNA shape, with a narrow DNA minor groove width (MGW) in the unbound state correlating with high affinity DNA-binding of WUS by the insertion of the conserved R38 into the minor groove. These findings are consistent with other examples of HD-DNA interactions showing that local optima in the DNA structure are preferentially recognized 9,36 . Besides DNA methylation, other epigenetic modifications, such as histone modifications, dynamically control gene expression and thereby play an important role in maintaining cellular identity 48 .…”
Section: Members Of Wus and Tale Subfamily Of Hd-tfs In Plants Have Bsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the bases at this position have a significant influence on the local DNA shape, with a narrow DNA minor groove width (MGW) in the unbound state correlating with high affinity DNA-binding of WUS by the insertion of the conserved R38 into the minor groove. These findings are consistent with other examples of HD-DNA interactions showing that local optima in the DNA structure are preferentially recognized 9,36 . Besides DNA methylation, other epigenetic modifications, such as histone modifications, dynamically control gene expression and thereby play an important role in maintaining cellular identity 48 .…”
Section: Members Of Wus and Tale Subfamily Of Hd-tfs In Plants Have Bsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Why does the +1 DNA motif position have such a strong influence on WUS-HD affinity, despite the fact that this base is not involved in hydrogen bond interactions? Since DNA shape can have a substantial effect on specificity and affinity of HD-DNA complexes 36 , we computationally investigated potential structural differences in the DNA sequences experimentally tested. To this end, we used the DNAShape tool 37 to predict the intrinsic conformation of unbound DNA probes differing in the +1 position focusing on minor groove width (MGW) (Fig.…”
Section: Wus-hd Binding Specificity Depends On Dna Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…can have a substantial effect on specificity and affinity of HD-DNA complexes 36 , we computationally investigated potential structural differences in the DNA sequences experimentally tested. To this end, we used the DNAShape tool 37 to predict the intrinsic conformation of unbound DNA probes differing in the +1 position focusing on minor groove width (MGW) (Fig.…”
Section: Wus Has a Canonical Hd Fold With Unique Structural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1; Tables S1,S2). The energy cost required to distort DNA must come from favorable intermolecular contacts that form upon complex formation 13,14 . This energetic cost could vary with sequence and contribute to protein-DNA binding affinity and selectivity 2,15,16 .…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%