Targeting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to combat cancer is increasingly being investigated using a variety of small molecule inhibitors. Clinical success for these inhibitors has been hampered due to serious side-effects potentially arising from the inability to discriminate between non-cancerous and cancerous mitochondria. Although mitochondrial oxidative metabolism is essential for malignant growth, mitochondria OXPHOS is also essential to the physiology of all organs, including high-energy-demand organs like the heart. In comparing tumor OXPHOS reliance to these preeminent oxidative organs it is unclear if a therapeutic window for targeting mitochondrial OXPHOS in cancer exists. To address this gap in knowledge, mitochondrial OXPHOS was comprehensively evaluated across various murine tumors and compared to both matched normal tissues and other organs. When compared to both matched normal tissues, as well as high OXPHOS reliant organs like heart, intrinsic expression of the OXPHOS complexes, as well as OXPHOS flux were consistently lower across distinct tumor types. Operating on the assumption that intrinsic OXPHOS expression/function predicts OXPHOS reliance in vivo, these data suggest that pharmacologic blockade of mitochondrial OXPHOS likely compromises bioenergetic homeostasis in healthy oxidative organs prior to impacting tumor mitochondrial flux in a clinically meaningful way. Although these data caution against the use of indiscriminate mitochondrial inhibitors for cancer treatment, considerable heterogeneity was observed across tumor types with respect to both mitochondrial proteome composition and substrate-specific flux, highlighting the possibility for targeting discrete mitochondrial proteins or pathways unique to a given tumor type.