Intrinsic Shapes of Empathy: Functional Brain Network Topology Encodes Intersubjective Experience and Awareness Traits

Abstract

Trait empathy is an essential personality feature in the intricacy of typical social inclinations of individuals. Empathy is likely supported by multilevel neuronal network functioning, whereas local topological properties determine network integrity. In the present functional MRI study (N = 116), we aimed to trace empathic traits to the intrinsic brain network architecture. Empathy was conceived as composed of two dimensions within the concept of pre-reflective, intersubjective understanding. Vicarious experience consists of the tendency to resonate with the feelings of other individuals, whereas intuitive understanding refers to a natural awareness of others’ emotional states. Analyses of graph theoretical measures of centrality showed a relationship between the fronto-parietal network and psychometric measures of vicarious experience, whereas intuitive understanding was associated with sensorimotor and subcortical networks. Salience network regions could constitute hubs for information processing underlying both dimensions. The network properties related to empathy dimensions mainly concern inter-network information flow. Moreover, interaction effects implied several sex differences in the relationship between functional network organization and trait empathy. These results reveal that distinct intrinsic topological network features explain individual differences in separate dimensions of intersubjective understanding. The findings could help understand the impact of brain damage or stimulation through alterations of empathy-related network integrity.

The nested hierarchy of self and its trauma: In search for a synchronic dynamic and topographical re-organization

“…These findings relate to biobehavioral synchrony, via the consistency of caregiving over time, which seems to enhance the development of the child's sense of self and relatedness. These first synchronous experiences, facilitated through the insula and amygdala as a part of the affective-limbic system, seem to shape the development of a physiological and psychological "baseline" (refer to Northoff, 2016;Scalabrini et al, 2021cScalabrini et al, , 2022 that later assemble predictive models that facilitate the development of a social brain and the self (Apps and Tsakiris, 2014;Atzil et al, 2018) (see also Ebisch et al, 2022 for the role of te insula and empathic traits). The baseline means that the self serves as a reference or standard for any subsequent input processing; more importantly, the self as the baseline serves as a reference for subsequent cognition, affect, and other functions -this is well expressed in the concept of the "psychological baseline" (Northoff and Bermpohl, 2004;Scalabrini et al, 2021cScalabrini et al, , 2022 and the baseline model of self-specificity (BMSS; Northoff, 2016;Scalabrini et al, 2022).…”

Working nurses’ empathy with patients in public hospitals

“…The exact cause of this difference is unknown, but it could relate to topological networks with unequal characteristics that determine individual differences in the dimensions of empathy ( 49 ) . The formation of the specific topology of the networks in each human being will be strongly influenced by external stimulations more than by genotypic potentiality ( 45 ) .…”

Why people hesitate to help: Neural correlates of the counter-dynamics of altruistic helping and individual differences in daily helping tendencies

“…Second, with respect to our conceptualization and experimental manipulation of the empathic process, we did not explicitly take into account a multidimensional model that includes perceptual and cognitive components of empathy (Gallese, 2003;Innamorati et al, 2019). However, the empathy-related brain regions identified in the current study (i.e., the insula and TPJ, as well as prefrontal areas) partly overlap with the putative neural correlates of perceptual and cognitive components of empathy (Ebisch et al, 2022).…”