2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic Variable Learning for Brain-Machine Interface Control by Human Anterior Intraparietal Cortex

Abstract: Highlights d AIP neurons learn to modulate their activity to compensate for errors in BMI tasks d Changes in the neural activity reflect a cognitive readaptation mechanism d AIP fails to compensate for errors when novel neural activity patterns are required d Learning in AIP is constrained by the pre-existing neuronal structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We posit that the formation of new neural activity patterns during long-term BCI learning may provide a parsimonious explanation for the tuning curve changes reported in earlier studies. In particular, our results combined with earlier BCI studies (69, 15, 16, 18, 2226) and motor learning studies (27, 28) suggest that fast and slow learning are driven by different neural mechanisms. Fast learning can be accomplished by reassociating preexisting patterns of neural activity with new behaviors (9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We posit that the formation of new neural activity patterns during long-term BCI learning may provide a parsimonious explanation for the tuning curve changes reported in earlier studies. In particular, our results combined with earlier BCI studies (69, 15, 16, 18, 2226) and motor learning studies (27, 28) suggest that fast and slow learning are driven by different neural mechanisms. Fast learning can be accomplished by reassociating preexisting patterns of neural activity with new behaviors (9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…By construction, forming new patterns of neural activity is the optimal neural strategy for learning to control the cursor under an OMP mapping because this would lead to the fastest cursor speeds. However, it is possible that the brain is unable to form new patterns because constraints exist on the patterns of neural activity that a population of neurons can exhibit (8, 9, 1518). If this is the case, the monkey could still show some limited behavioral improvements by learning to reassociate preexisting patterns of neural activity with different intended movements (9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of uniform shifts provides evidence for formation of new activity patterns during short-term motor learning. Conventionally, the circuit structure or connectivity of an existing network has been thought to constrain the patterns that its neurons are capable of exhibiting, which may limit its capacity for short-term learning [41][42][43] . Here our results suggest that the motor system may be more flexible than previously thought, and can generate novel activity patterns during short-term learning in order to quickly adapt to a changing environment 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a unique opportunity, we investigated touch processing at the level of single neurons in a tetraplegic human subject recorded with an electrode array implanted in the left PPC for an ongoing brain machine interface (BMI) clinical trial. In previous work, we have referred to the implant area as the anterior intraparietal cortex, a region functionally defined in NHPs (3)(4)(5)(6)26). Here we will refer to the recording site as the postcentral-intraparietal area (PC-IP), acknowledging that further work is necessary to definitively characterize homologies between human and NHP anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%