2019
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-18-0213.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Along-Track Error Correlations for Altimetry Data in a Regional Ocean Prediction System

Abstract: Because of the systematic error in the processing of altimetry data, sea level anomaly (SLA) observation errors are likely affected by nonnegligible spatial correlations. To account for these, we exploit the synergy of altimetry data with in situ profiles from gliders, piloted to follow the altimetry tracks during the Long-Term Glider Mission for Environmental Characterization 2017 (LOGMEC17) observational campaign in the Ligurian Sea. The assimilation of along-track unfiltered sea level anomalies in a regiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we use the sealevel anomaly (SLA) from the Tailored Altimetry Products for Assimilation System (TAPAS) dataset (e.g. Pujol et al 2016;Storto et al 2019b), which provides data without along-track sub-sampling (Dufau et al 2016) and makes available the corrections applied to the signals retrieved from the altimetric waveforms (e.g. dynamic atmospheric corrections; Carrère and Lyard 2003; Taburet and SL-TAC Team 2019).…”
Section: Observation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we use the sealevel anomaly (SLA) from the Tailored Altimetry Products for Assimilation System (TAPAS) dataset (e.g. Pujol et al 2016;Storto et al 2019b), which provides data without along-track sub-sampling (Dufau et al 2016) and makes available the corrections applied to the signals retrieved from the altimetric waveforms (e.g. dynamic atmospheric corrections; Carrère and Lyard 2003; Taburet and SL-TAC Team 2019).…”
Section: Observation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the whole track is averaged to derive the mean freeboard change at one point in time, the uncertainties of the involved grid cells are propagated. Rather than assume that our freeboard measurement errors are not correlated in space or time, we employ a more conservative approach and propagate the uncertainties using a full covariance matrix to account for their correlation (Storto et al, 2019). In the absence of independent freeboard measurements for verification, we assume that altimeter-derived freeboards recorded along the same track are 60% correlated and that the initial freeboards, which are derived from measurements acquired along several independent tracks, are 30% correlated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOGMEC17 is an acoustical and oceanographic campaign aimed to study the variability and predictability of the oceanographic and acoustic environments on different temporal and spatial scales. The sea trial was conducted from 14 September to 14 November 2017 and two gliders were piloted, mostly to follow altimetry tracks and exploit the synergy between altimetry and gliders [20]. Here, glider data available from 21 September to 14 November 2017 were used as independent data to validate the SST data assimilation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the relaxation coefficient smoothly decreases to −12 W m −2 K −1 at noon, following the sinusoidal shape in order to give less weight to the nudging during daytime. The tuning of these parameters was performed in previous experiments [20]. More sophisticated relationships for β(t) could also be formulated (e.g., as a function of wind speed to decrease the relaxation in conditions of large skin SST warming, or to the MLD to modulate the propagation as a function of the ocean stratification) but are not considered here, where the aim is to compare a standard form of SST nudging to variational data assimilation of daytime SST data.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation