2013
DOI: 10.1108/heswbl-07-2012-0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing enterprise – research into the practical aspects of introducing innovative enterprise schemes as extra curricula activities in higher education

Abstract: Purpose – Enhancing student opportunity and providing an outstanding learning experience within an increasingly competitive market requires a multifaceted approach to learning. This paper aims to show how a social enterprise initiative can help students differentiate their offering to the workplace and in doing so develop skills that promote elegant self-management. Design/methodology/approach – The research is a continuous project to gather data to evaluate on the effectiveness of enterprise activities a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to entrepreneurial intentions (51%), far fewer studies exist on the relationship between EE and other subjective impact indicators (Levels 1 and 2 of our framework) including psychological variables such as attitude (20%, e.g., Chang, Benamraoui, & Rieple, 2014;; perceived feasibility (26%, e.g., Rauch & Hulsink, 2015; or skills and knowledge (21%., e.g., Burrows & Wragg, 2013;Premand, Brodmann, Almeida, Grun, & Barouni, 2016). Most studies suggest a positive link between the program and these variables, but some articles report results that are not significant or negative.…”
Section: Types Of Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to entrepreneurial intentions (51%), far fewer studies exist on the relationship between EE and other subjective impact indicators (Levels 1 and 2 of our framework) including psychological variables such as attitude (20%, e.g., Chang, Benamraoui, & Rieple, 2014;; perceived feasibility (26%, e.g., Rauch & Hulsink, 2015; or skills and knowledge (21%., e.g., Burrows & Wragg, 2013;Premand, Brodmann, Almeida, Grun, & Barouni, 2016). Most studies suggest a positive link between the program and these variables, but some articles report results that are not significant or negative.…”
Section: Types Of Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…outside our review, Neergaard et al 2012). In the articles in this stream, the pedagogical methods are experiential and entail working side by side with, for example, entrepreneurs (e.g., Chang & Rieple, 2013); realistic entrepreneurial exercises (e.g., ; starting and running a "real" business (e.g., Burrows & Wragg, 2013); and problem-based learning (e.g., Kirkwood, Dwyer, & Gray, 2014). Again, these studies report a positive link with lower level impact measures (skills and knowledge, and feasibility, e.g., Jones & Jones, 2011).…”
Section: Demand and Demand-competence Model Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, collecting data with regard to long-term effects is not easy. Longterm studies such as those delivered by Dutta et al (2011), Burrows and Wragg (2013), or Matlay (2008) make this difficulty clear.…”
Section: Increasing Start-up Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They emphasized that it is important to consider the significant impact of moderators, such as the attributes of entrepreneurship education, differences between students, and cultural values, on entrepreneurial intentions. Most studies suggest a positive link between the educational program and students' entrepreneurial intentions, attitude, knowledge, and skills [84][85][86][87], but some articles report results that are not significant or negative. For example, Lanero, et al [88] reported that there is no significant link between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial attitudes among Spanish students.…”
Section: Comparison Based On Educational Experiences In Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%