2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70407-4_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Feedback in Qanary: How Users Can Interact with QA Systems

Abstract: Abstract. Providing a general and efficient Question Answering system over Knowledge Bases (KB) has been studied for years. Most of the works concentrated on the automatic translation of a natural language question into a formal query. However, few works address the problem on how users can interact with Question Answering systems during this translation process. We present a general mechanism that allows users to interact with Question Answering systems. It is built on top of Qanary, a framework for integrati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it can be used to deeply study the interactions of the end-users with QA systems. This includes: 1. collect end-user queries to create easily large and realistic benchmarks, 2. studies to analyze which questions users ask, 3. study how much context information should be presented to a user together with the answer, 4. create interfaces, like the disambiguation interfaces in [3], to allow users to interact with QA systems. These examples shows how advances on the front-end can also be beneficial for classical QA research in the back-end.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it can be used to deeply study the interactions of the end-users with QA systems. This includes: 1. collect end-user queries to create easily large and realistic benchmarks, 2. studies to analyze which questions users ask, 3. study how much context information should be presented to a user together with the answer, 4. create interfaces, like the disambiguation interfaces in [3], to allow users to interact with QA systems. These examples shows how advances on the front-end can also be beneficial for classical QA research in the back-end.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we plan to extend the functionality of the QAnswer KG service by integrating additional services: (A) SPARQLtoUser (cf., [6]), a service capable of transforming a SPARQL query into a user understandable representation, (B) SummaServer [11], a service that selects between all triples associated to an RDF entity, the most important ones, (C) a service to allow users to disambiguate between different entities, as described in [7]. Note that these services are already used when querying some KGs like Wikidata, DBpedia and DBLP, but they are not sufficiently generalized to work over any KG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, some example queries (i.e., candidates for a correct interpretation) for our running example are shown. 7 PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/> PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>.…”
Section: Qanswer Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint entity and relation linking (41) KB incompleteness Hybrid system (19,38,65) Modular design, module reusability Integration framework (22,36). Modules collection (43). Optimal module selection (48) Relation linking BERT transformer (60) Hierarchical RNN (30).…”
Section: Challenges Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%