2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eij.2019.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing languid particle dynamics to a selection of PSO variants

Abstract: Previous research showed that conditioning a PSO agent's movement based on its personal fitness improvement enhances the standard PSO method. In this article, languid particle dynamics (LPD) technique is used on five adequate and widely used PSO variants.Five unmodified PSO variants were tested against their LPD-implemented counterparts on three search space dimensionalities (10, 20, and 50 dimensions) and 30 test functions of the CEC 2014 benchmark test. In the preliminary phase of the testing four of the fiv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The languid particle dynamics modification [ 66 ] was used which involves setting the inertia of a particle to zero if it is not moving in the direction of better fitness. This modification was used as it proved beneficial to the standard PSO algorithm on the problem of water distribution pipe network routing [ 67 ]. The PSO implementation in the python numerical optimization module indago 0.1.2. was also used.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The languid particle dynamics modification [ 66 ] was used which involves setting the inertia of a particle to zero if it is not moving in the direction of better fitness. This modification was used as it proved beneficial to the standard PSO algorithm on the problem of water distribution pipe network routing [ 67 ]. The PSO implementation in the python numerical optimization module indago 0.1.2. was also used.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where V i is the volume of the i th stiffener; n is the total number of the stiffeners; σ max is the allowed maximum von Mises stress for both shell elements and stiffener elements; σ is the material yield strength; w and h are the design variables; and w, w, h, and h are the lower and upper bounds of the stiffener width and height. Several optimization methods, such as the genetic algorithm [22][23][24] and particle swarm optimization [25][26][27], can be used to solve the above minimization problem. In this paper, the nonlinear constrained problem formulated in Equation ( 19) was solved with the interior point method in the MATLAB Optimization Toolbox, where the gradients are estimated using finite differences.…”
Section: Optimization Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on utilizing particle-wise inertia control for resolving personal fitness improvement dependent particle movement, the PFIDI approach and the LPSO method [3,4] were proposed in which each particle tracks its fitness evolution so that this information can be used for altering its movement process. This information is then used in a switch-like condition on inertia term of each individual particle:…”
Section: Pso and Languid Particle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the k-th particle has inertia only as long as it keeps advancing in a direction of better fitness (the formulation (3) assumes a minimization problem). The correction of +0.05 for inertia weight when inertia is not disabled was proposed in [4] so as to compensate for the reduced overall velocity of the swarm due to the intermittent inertial velocity of the particles. Behaving in this manner, a particle disregards its previous direction if it failed to take it to a better location.…”
Section: Pso and Languid Particle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation