Introducing Lean Six Sigma to a German municipality: an action research report

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to expand the knowledge about Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation in the public sector. By analyzing an LSS improvement initiative in a German municipality, examples of success, barriers and challenges are discussed. A comparison with literature regarding the production and service sectors unfolds similarities and differences. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies the action research method. Especially for the broad field of project management, methods focusing on actual experience from practice have been recommended by many researchers. Findings Implementations of LSS in the public sector seem to be particularly challenging and lengthy. Change and communication management have proved to be the most important aspects to successful acceptance, cooperation and improvement sustainability. In the analyzed cases, the needed volume of data could often not be procured. The applied Six Sigma methodology primarily included the DMAIC project phases as well as selected standard instruments. In contrast, the lean elements of LSS achieved more results and were appreciated by project team members. Originality/value The LSS application in this paper provides insights into practical implementation experience in a municipality, as well as lessons learned. Until now, most research addressed the single application of lean, continuous improvement or Six Sigma. This paper represents the first academic report of a LSS program in a German municipality and underlines the need for scientific support of those initiatives in further municipalities worldwide.

A study into the reasons for process improvement project failures: results from a pilot survey

“…The implementation of a LSS project typically involves a change in the existing culture and the acceptance of a new culture for top management and all other employees in the organization (Antony and Gupta, 2019; Iyede et al , 2018; Yadav and Desai, 2017). Employees can strongly resist change because of unknown consequences, such as job losses, new working practices, new processes and procedures (Antony and Gupta, 2019; Iyede et al , 2018; Kregel and Coners, 2018). As such, it is recommended that management identify potential causes of employees’ resistance to change and take appropriate action by developing strategies to sustain a positive culture and avoid this situation in the long-term (Antony and Gupta, 2019).…”

Kaizen in university teaching: continuous course improvement

“…Students had the opportunity to work on a real LSS project in a company as part of their master's thesis. They were required to select their thesis position by themselves, although the faculty supported the identification of such projects through an established industry network (Kregel and Coners, 2018). The main lecturer for the course also provided supervision for the projects and carried out the tollgate inspections, thereby supervising and supporting the application of the theoretical knowledge of students in the real world.…”

Business Process Management Culture in Public Administration and Its Determinants

“…Many projects using continuous improvement methods (e.g. Lean Management or Lean Six Sigma) fail in the public sector when they do not consider sector-specific characteristics, such as organizational culture and business logic (Kregel and Coners 2018;Radnor and Osborne 2013). Especially radical organizational changes lead to strong resistance within public administration (McNulty and Ferlie 2004).…”