Introducing Technology in Child Welfare Referrals: A Case Study

Dellor, Elinam; Lovato-Hermann, Kristina; Curry, Susanna R.; Freisthler, Bridget

doi:10.1080/15228835.2015.1107520

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To facilitate collaboration and coordination of services for EPIC, all partner agencies entered into one comprehensive memorandum of understanding (MOU) to jointly administer and implement EPIC. All partner agencies further agreed to use the Needs Portal [ 34 ], a hybrid web-based resource and referral and Management Information System (MIS), as the organizing body for communication around each case. The Needs Portal is used to create referrals for services, track dates of service provision, and record responses to the UNCOPE and trauma screening and assessment tools.…”

Section: Methods / Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Across Ohio, parental substance abuse has contributed to a marked increase in the number of children in foster care. Children exposed to parental substance use have a higher likelihood of physical abuse and neglect, and consequently a variety of physical, psychological and cognitive problems. The Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC) program is a collaborative effort between the Ohio State University College of Social Work, two county offices of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, two juvenile courts and local behavioral health agencies. The goal of EPIC is to use three evidence-based and evidence-informed practices to reduce abusive and neglectful parenting, reduce addiction severity in parents, and improve permanency outcomes for families involved with the child welfare system due to substance abuse. Methods EPIC is a quasi-experimental study. Under the program, child welfare-involved adults who screen positive for substances are matched with a peer recovery supporter. Participants are also incentivized to participate in family treatment drug court, medications for opioid use disorders and home-based parenting supports. Participating adults (N = 250) are matched with comparison groups from counties participating in a separate intervention (Ohio START) and to those receiving treatment as usual, resulting in a final sample of 750 adults. Primary outcomes including addiction severity, child trauma symptoms, resilience, and attachment are assessed at baseline and at program completion. Additional outcomes include timely access to treatment services, length of placement in out-of-home care and recidivism into the child welfare system. Discussion This intervention formalizes cross-system collaboration between child welfare, behavioral health and juvenile courts to support families affected by addiction. The use of three evidence-based or evidence-informed strategies presents the opportunity to determine specific strategies that are most effective for reducing addiction severity. Lastly, the intervention combines several sources of funding to bolster sustainability beyond the life of the Regional Partnership Grant (RPG). Trial registration NCT04700696. Registered January 7, 2021-retrospectively registered.

show abstract

Section: Methods / Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Child welfare agencies involved in Ohio START are required to track and report on substance use screenings, family peer mentor contacts, treatment dates, and dates of family team meetings. The OSU Needs Portal is a web-based system designed to manage child welfare workers' referrals [55,56] that has been adapted for collecting START fidelity and service data, and rolled out in all 17 child welfare agencies. Aggregated data are available publicly (https://u.osu.edu/ohiostart/evaluation/ dashboard/).…”

Section: County Fidelity/service Tracking -Osu Needs Portalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cross-system interventions can help integrate services across different service delivery systems but require organizations to establish strong collaborative relationships for implementation. Contingency theory suggests that the effectiveness of different collaborative strategies (i.e. specific ways organizations align operations and services) varies by context. This paper describes a study of different strategies for fostering collaboration between child welfare and substance abuse treatment agencies and the conditions under which they are effective for implementation. We also describe the development and piloting of the Collaborating Across Systems for Program Implementation (CASPI) tool-a decision-making guide intended to help researchers and organizational leaders identify and use appropriate collaborative strategies for their context. Methods/design: This multisite longitudinal, mixed methods study, leverages a naturally occurring implementation initiative-in up to 17 Ohio counties-to implement Ohio START (Sobriety Treatment and Reducing Trauma). STAR T is a child welfare model that requires strong collaboration with local substance use treatment organizations to promote integrated services. During the first two years, we will identify collaborative strategies associated with improved START implementation (penetration and fidelity) and service delivery outcomes (timeliness), given system, and organizational features. We will conduct a convergent mixed methods study drawing on worker surveys, agency documents, administrative data, formal partner agreements, and group interviews. Data will be integrated and analyzed using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). To develop the CASPI, an expert panel comprised of implementation experts, and community stakeholders will convene to synthesize our findings and develop contents (including a decision tree). During the final year of the study, we will assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the CASPI in a randomized vignette experiment, and a pilot-test with 3 child welfare agencies that have not yet implemented START.

show abstract

“…Four papers [135][136][137][138] described experiences of using networks ( Table 14). In terms of relevance, all four articles [135][136][137][138] were in the outer ring: the interventions were those that we were interested in, but they were focused on both broader populations and limited settings, the latter typically covering just two organisations. The papers were heterogeneous in terms of methods, populations, interventions studied and settings.…”

Section: Users' Experiences Of Using Interoperable Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of interoperable information technology networks on patient safety: a realist synthesis

Keen

Abdulwahid

King

et al. 2020

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Interoperable networks connect information technology systems of different organisations, allowing professionals in one organisation to access patient data held in another one. Health policy-makers in many countries believe that they will improve the co-ordination of services and, hence, the quality of services and patient safety. To the best of our knowledge, there have not been any previous systematic reviews of the effects of these networks on patient safety. Objectives The aim of the study was to establish how, why and in what circumstances interoperable information technology networks improved patient safety, failed to do so or increased safety risks. The objectives of the study were to (1) identify programme theories and prioritise theories to review; (2) search systematically for evidence to test the theories; (3) undertake quality appraisal, and use included texts to support, refine or reject programme theories; (4) synthesise the findings; and (5) disseminate the findings to a range of audiences. Design Realist synthesis, including consultation with stakeholders in nominal groups and semistructured interviews. Settings and participants Following a stakeholder prioritisation process, several domains were reviewed: older people living at home requiring co-ordinated care, at-risk children living at home and medicines reconciliation services for any patients living at home. The effects of networks on services in health economies were also investigated. Intervention An interoperable network that linked at least two organisations, including a maximum of one hospital, in a city or region. Outcomes Increase, reduction or no change in patients’ risks, such as a change in the risk of taking an inappropriate medication. Results We did not find any detailed accounts of the ways in which interoperable networks are intended to work and improve patient safety. Theory fragments were identified and used to develop programme and mid-range theories. There is good evidence that there are problems with the co-ordination of services in each of the domains studied. The implicit hypothesis about interoperable networks is that they help to solve co-ordination problems, but evidence across the domains showed that professionals found interoperable networks difficult to use. There is insufficient evidence about the effectiveness of interoperable networks to allow us to establish how and why they affect patient safety. Limitations The lack of evidence about patient-specific measures of effectiveness meant that we were not able to determine ‘what works’, nor any variations in what works, when interoperable networks are deployed and used by health and social care professionals. Conclusions There is a dearth of evidence about the effects of interoperable networks on patient safety. It is not clear if the networks are associated with safer treatment and care, have no effects or increase clinical risks. Future work Possible future research includes primary studies of the effectiveness of interoperable networks, of economies of scope and scale and, more generally, on the value of information infrastructures. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017073004. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

show abstract

Introducing Technology in Child Welfare Referrals: A Case Study

Cited by 16 publications

References 27 publications

Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse

Enhancing Permanency in Children and Families (EPIC): a child welfare intervention for parental substance abuse

Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study

The effects of interoperable information technology networks on patient safety: a realist synthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About