Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A New Dataset on US Military Interventions, 1776–2019

Kushi, Sidita; Toft, Monica Duffy

doi:10.1177/00220027221117546

Cited by 31 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The main methodological approaches, which were taken as a basis for developing the methodology of this study and were previously presented by scientists, related to the issues of the impact of war on: GDP dynamics [14], migration processes and poverty [16], opportunities for economic recovery [9]. The paper [20] examine war's direct costs (human and economic). The scientists [21] suggested returning to the concept of "wartime" as a Based on the above, it is advisable to formulate the following main hypotheses: an objective assessment of the economic and social consequences of war can influence the duration of the war; small countries have the possibility to withstand wars in the 21st century.…”

Section: Methodology Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

The economic consequences of the war in the 21^st century at the regional and global levels

Kasych

2023

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the theoretical and practical effects of wars in the 21st century on the economy. The concept of “military economy” is highlighted. The dynamics of military expenditures are analyzed. The reasons behind and types of wars that have occurred in the past and are currently occurring are made clear. Emphasis is placed on studying the economic consequences of Russia’s war in Ukraine. The assessment of the potential of countries before the war testified and confirmed the aggressive goals of a large country that attacked a much smaller one. The war against Ukraine put the issue of preserving the independence of small countries on the agenda. The main focus of the essay is on examining the economic effects of the conflict, not just on the economies of the participating nations but also on the world economy. The instability of individual commodity markets, inflation, and migration became the main mechanisms of the war’s influence. As a result, the indicators of economic growth of many countries of the world are deteriorating. The raised questions actualize the task before the world community of finding new methods of solving the problems of wars.

show abstract

Section: Methodology Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

The economic consequences of the war in the 21^st century at the regional and global levels

Kasych

2023

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Da igual que unos y otros hayan ocupado y expandido el lugar en el comercio mundial que ocupaba UK, siguiendo unas pautas que es posible reconstruir en otros muchos imperios anteriores (Gokmen, Vermeulen, & Vézina, 2020). Es indiferente que los conflictos militares (Kushi & Toft, 2022) solo se entiendan, al menos en gran parte, en perspectiva imperial: asegurar que impere el «code of capital» y el reconocimiento de la moneda imperial. La otra parte de los conflictos cinéticos, que conduce a aumentar la confusión conceptual, responde a las luchas entre las élites para 34 Algunos, un tanto confusamente, han señalado el reforzamiento de los poderes «imperiales» del ejecutivo, confundiéndolo con algo que sí ha tenido lugar, el incremento de los poderes burocráticos sin legitimidad democrática alguna, tanto en el ejecutivo como, sobre todo, en el judicial.…”

Section: La Financialización Del Capitalismo Está Asociada a La Polít...unclassified

El particular momento del dominio por el capital ficticio

Núñez

2024

REG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The financialized capitalism characteristic of our time is not new. There have been other periods in which fictitious capital has been, if not dominant, a relevant form of capital. It is notable that the fictitious capital has reached, in quantitative terms, values never previously achieved in history. The essential causes of this dominance, the growing imbalance between the different forms of capital and between it and work, are not new either. It is the interaction between these “traditional” causes and factors typical of our time, a currency that is both a country's currency and a world currency, the infrastructural power of central banks and the scale of the latest wave of globalization, accelerated by the digitalization of societies, which allows us to characterize our time. The spiral generated by the relationship between these factors and the political systems of liberal democracy that emerged from the Cold War, makes these systems particularly irreformable. That is why crises of various types accumulate and the ability to resolve them without violence are becoming negligible. A wave of instability on a global scale appears inevitable. El capitalismo financializado característico de nuestra época no es nuevo. Ha habido otros períodos en los cuales el capital ficticio ha sido la forma, si no dominante, si muy relevante, del capital. Si es reseñable que ha alcanzado en términos cuantitativos unos valores nunca alcanzados previamente en la historia. Las causas esenciales de esa dominancia, el creciente desequilibrio entre las diferentes formas de capital y entre este y el trabajo, tampoco son nuevas. Es la interacción entre esas causas y factores propios de la época, una moneda que es al tiempo moneda de país y moneda mundo, el poder infraestructural de los bancos centrales y la escala de la última ola de globalización, acelerada por la digitalización de las sociedades, que permite caracterizar nuestra época. La espiral generada por la relación entre estos factores y los sistemas políticos de democracia liberal que emergieron de la guerra fría, hace de estos sistemas particularmente irreformables. Es por ello que las crisis de diverso tipo se acumulan y la capacidad de resolverlas sin violencia es cada vez menor. Una ola de inestabilidad a escala global se vislumbra como inevitable.

show abstract

“…No es extraño, por todo ello que en la tercera década del sxxi, emergen otros cuantos, que se reclaman "neo idealistas" y que entonan la misma cantinela de fondo de los de su especie, aunque las letras varían: su verso favorito es el enfrentamiento entre democracias y autocracias. Sin perjuicio de que como demuestran (Kushi & Toft, 2022), (Toft & Kushi, 2023), no es cierto que las democracias sean más "pacificas" que otros regímenes -más bien al contrario-y sin perjuicio de no asumir ninguna clase de determinismo 24 , estos neo idealistas, como los antiguos idealistas, sufren de confusión entre democracia e imperio ( (Nuñez, 2022, pág. (a)), (Nuñez, 2022, pág.…”

Section: Neo Idealistas Paz Liberal Autocraciasunclassified

Instituciones independientes y policrisis

Nuñez¹

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The struggle for hegemony has adopted in the modern world an imperial form that is not recognizable with the classical canons of what is understood by empire. But it works as such, leveraging on the currency. Of the various elements of the panoply of imperial construction, we will deal here with the idea of independence of institutions, including those of currency management; independence of popular sovereignty in the case of the center of the empire and national-popular in the case of the territories subject to domination. The idea of the independence of institutions builds the paradigm of a natural evolution of the world, so that power ceases to be the elaboration and imposition of alternatives to become the interpretation of arcane signs. In this way, the “sigetics” of suffering for common people is built, where its causes appear as a result of simple chance -bad luck- or maladjustment -bad construction- or laziness -bad will-. In the first part we will analyze the theoretical bases of the construction of independence, in the second we will analyze some of its consequences and, in the third part, we will propose some conclusions and solutions that ordinary people can promote to regain control of the future of the world.

show abstract

Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A New Dataset on US Military Interventions, 1776–2019

Cited by 31 publications

References 58 publications

The economic consequences of the war in the 21^st century at the regional and global levels

The economic consequences of the war in the 21^st century at the regional and global levels

El particular momento del dominio por el capital ficticio

Instituciones independientes y policrisis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A New Dataset on US Military Interventions, 1776–2019

Cited by 31 publications

References 58 publications

The economic consequences of the war in the 21st century at the regional and global levels

The economic consequences of the war in the 21st century at the regional and global levels

El particular momento del dominio por el capital ficticio

Instituciones independientes y policrisis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

The economic consequences of the war in the 21^st century at the regional and global levels

The economic consequences of the war in the 21^st century at the regional and global levels