Faith in Objects 2011
DOI: 10.1057/9780230339729_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 Hasinoff correctly points out that observers, from school officials and prosecutors to media pundits and even legal scholars, too often conflate voluntary sexting by the person whose picture is being transmitted, or being an intended recipient, with maliciously distributing the pictures beyond their intended audience without the creator's consent. 60 She argues convincingly that the person who transmits the sext without the creator's consent is invading the creator's digital and personal privacy, which can often have serious repercussions. Consent, she insists, must be explicit.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Hasinoff correctly points out that observers, from school officials and prosecutors to media pundits and even legal scholars, too often conflate voluntary sexting by the person whose picture is being transmitted, or being an intended recipient, with maliciously distributing the pictures beyond their intended audience without the creator's consent. 60 She argues convincingly that the person who transmits the sext without the creator's consent is invading the creator's digital and personal privacy, which can often have serious repercussions. Consent, she insists, must be explicit.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%