Sense and Avoid in UAS 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781119964049.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad range of RPAs includes a variety of forms and sizes from micro-scale (Capello et al 2012) to the large military unmanned drone planes (Springer 2013), and can include kites, blimps and balloons dependent upon their imaging payload (Klemas 2015). RPA have been classified according to characteristics such as size, weight and function (Hoffer et al 2014;Anderson and Gaston 2013;Limnaios et al 2012;Watts et al 2012). Most RPA, however, fit into two basic functional categories: either fixed wing planes, that need to sustain velocity in order to stay airborne, or rotor propelled vehicles (rotating wings) which fly or hover with fine control of rotor speed using a flight controller.…”
Section: The Pace and Impact Of Rpa Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad range of RPAs includes a variety of forms and sizes from micro-scale (Capello et al 2012) to the large military unmanned drone planes (Springer 2013), and can include kites, blimps and balloons dependent upon their imaging payload (Klemas 2015). RPA have been classified according to characteristics such as size, weight and function (Hoffer et al 2014;Anderson and Gaston 2013;Limnaios et al 2012;Watts et al 2012). Most RPA, however, fit into two basic functional categories: either fixed wing planes, that need to sustain velocity in order to stay airborne, or rotor propelled vehicles (rotating wings) which fly or hover with fine control of rotor speed using a flight controller.…”
Section: The Pace and Impact Of Rpa Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%