Introduction

Dressler, Wolfgang U.; Pfeiffer, Oskar E.; Pöchtrager, Markus A.; Rennison, John R.

doi:10.1075/cilt.201.01dre

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The present study continues the functionalist and constructivist tradition (Bowerman 1980(Bowerman , 1985Dressler 1997a;Slobin 1985;Tomasello 2003; among others) and postulates an essential impact of input, linguistic structure and pragmatics on the emergence of case in ection and case functions. Additionally, as it has been shown elsewhere a certain amount of lexical entries (or lexicon items) may serve as a platform for the acquisition of morphology (Gold eld, Reznick 1990; Mervis, Bertrand 1995).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emergence of Case Meanings in Russian - Empirical Evidence from One Month, from One Child

Gagarina¹,

Eliseeva²

2009

Ad Verba Liberorum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary IntroductionThe article presents emergence of case marking on nouns and development of case meanings within one month in the acquisition of Russian. For this purpose density recordings of 1;9 were extracted from longitudinal data of Liza E. As revealed by the analysis, within less than one month the in ections of all cases occur in singular. Data show that the emergence of case marking and case meanings take place parallel to a continuous use of one-word utterances. Rich in ectional morphology (being combined with su cient lexicon) compensates for the poverty of argument structure and the complexity of an utterance. The child does not need several components in the utterance to make it clear.Aim of the study Beyond a descriptive goal, this study aims at tracing order of the emergence of case meanings at age 1;09 with one child. At the same time it gives brief information about the early lexicon, number of components of utterances and lexical spurt in nouns and case meanings around age 1;09. Materials and methodsLongitudinal videotaped recordings of Liza E. at the age of one month were used. All density recordings from 1;09 were divided according to the equal intervals, so that the occurrence of all case forms and meanings during 27 days was traced. ResultsThe data provide evidence for the emergence of all case forms and a broad range of case meanings within approx. one month. This intensive increase within a relatively short period of time can be called an in ectional spurt in noun case in ection and case meanings. Earlier, at 1;08, a vocabulary spurt in Liza was documented. The intensive development in the domain of the lexicon and noun morphology around 1;09 was not documented for syntax: the number of utterance components stayed at the level of one or two words. Thus, our empirical data do not corroborate the co-development hypothesis of Rispoli (1999), who proposes co-development of case marking and agreement of subjects with verbs.The order of the emergence of cases is NOM, ACC, LOC, GEN, DAT, and INST. These case meanings occur gradually, despite the restricted interval between their rst occurrences. ConclusionsOur empirical data do not corroborate the co-development hypothesis of Rispoli (1999), who proposes the co-development of case marking and agreement of subjects with verbs. We presented only the initial occurrences of case meanings and did not treat the contrastive case oppositions, so the question about factors determining the acquisition of a given form or category stays beyond the scope of the present article. The order of occurrence of case forms and meanings in general does corroborate previous ndings on the acquisition of cases in other languages (see, for example (Szagun 2004;Tracy 1986; Voeikova, Dressler 2002)).

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%