Truth, Silence, and Violence in Emerging States 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781351141123-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Russell (2019) has highlighted a conceptualization over the regimes of silence by exploring the dimensions of creation, enforcement, and transformation (of silences). Based on this, Russel has designated the regimes of silence as a “matter of social reality as well as a political creation” (10) where the power manifests between these intersecting fields.…”
Section: De-securitization and The Construction Of Silence(s) In Post...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Russell (2019) has highlighted a conceptualization over the regimes of silence by exploring the dimensions of creation, enforcement, and transformation (of silences). Based on this, Russel has designated the regimes of silence as a “matter of social reality as well as a political creation” (10) where the power manifests between these intersecting fields.…”
Section: De-securitization and The Construction Of Silence(s) In Post...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These personal recollections, although anonymous, stand in contrast to the general absence of shared memories about the riots, as both the state and civilians remain silent about these events. Drawing on insights from research into politically repressed social memories (Ben-Ze’ev et al, 2010; Russell, 2019a; Winichakul, 2020), this article offers a thematic analysis of some of the stories and memories shared anonymously by Indonesian civilians about these riots that are rarely discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to contextualise these results from the anonymous survey, we first give a brief background on the May 1998 riots, their sensitive and contentious position within contemporary Indonesian political discourse, as well as some of the history of anti-Chinese racism and violence. We then describe respondents’ memories in a context where the topic is taboo, and where “regimes of silence” limit not just what can be said openly but what is possible to discuss even privately within communities and families (Russell, 2019b). To that end, we outline some of the responses received in the survey, taken from open-text boxes with unlimited characters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%