About the House 1995
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511607653.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
76
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides its ritual and religious role, the house is an institution that regulates property, work, consumption, belonging, power, etc. he house produces or combines several other dimensions of social organisation (Carsten & Hugh-Jones, 1995;Fox, 1980Fox, , 1996Lévi-Strauss, 1983;Traube, 1987).…”
Section: Methodological Mediationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides its ritual and religious role, the house is an institution that regulates property, work, consumption, belonging, power, etc. he house produces or combines several other dimensions of social organisation (Carsten & Hugh-Jones, 1995;Fox, 1980Fox, , 1996Lévi-Strauss, 1983;Traube, 1987).…”
Section: Methodological Mediationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schneider concluded that "kinship" as conceived in anthropology could not be meaningfully studied cross-culturally. " (Galvin 2001,110) Schneider's critique is widely acknowledged to have marked a turning point in anthropology's study of social relationships and interactions Carsten 1991Carsten ,1995Carsten ,2000M. Strathem 1992;Holy 1996;Schweitzer 2000).…”
Section: Schneider 1984) That Mainly European and American Anthropolomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand the alternative emphasis that Holy ascribes to Carsten (1995) and Bouquet (1993) of `relatedness' is as a concept that `does not presuppose that genealogical relations are necessarily the most important' (Bouquet 1993,157), but which does give a sense of the focus on social bonds and interactions. Of course, in having this emphasis, as Holy points out, and Carsten (2000) concedes, this conversely has the weakness of not delineating which category of `relationships' are considered significant.…”
Section: Deconstructing `Kinship'; Genealogy or Social Bonds?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carsten and Hugh-Jones discuss this Lévi-Straussian argument of houses, stating: "'Transfixing' an unstable union, transcending the opposition between wife-givers and wife-takers and between descent and alliance, the house as institution is an illusory objectification of the unstable relation of alliance to which it lends solidity (1987: 155)" (Carsten & Hugh Jones 1995: 8, see also Raahauge 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%