The Time of Anthropology 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003087199-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: I do not define time, space, place and motion as being well known to all. But it must be observed that the vulgar conceive those quantities only from the relation they bear to sensible objects. And thence arise certain prejudices, for the removing of which, it is proper to distinguish them into absolute and relative, true and apparent, mathematical and vulgar.I. Absolute, true and mathematical time, in itself, from its own nature, flows equally, without relation to anything external; and by another name is cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, each of the cases shows, in different and situated ways, how the expectations of the biosciences can be subverted, and, further, how the ‘chronocracy’ of the biosciences can be challenged. That is, the authors use biocircularity and recursive embodiment to analyse and challenge the dominance of technoscientific temporalities; to show up the limitations of the capacity of scientific knowledge to decisively or definitively ‘shape the temporalities in which people live out their everyday lives’ (Kirtsoglou and Simpson, 2021: 3). An attention to the biocircular makes clear that alter -, para- , or counter -temporalities exist, and that these other forms of temporal experience and reasoning allow people to interpret their bodily existence and to create and value ways of being that might be invisible to or derogated by the biosciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of the cases shows, in different and situated ways, how the expectations of the biosciences can be subverted, and, further, how the ‘chronocracy’ of the biosciences can be challenged. That is, the authors use biocircularity and recursive embodiment to analyse and challenge the dominance of technoscientific temporalities; to show up the limitations of the capacity of scientific knowledge to decisively or definitively ‘shape the temporalities in which people live out their everyday lives’ (Kirtsoglou and Simpson, 2021: 3). An attention to the biocircular makes clear that alter -, para- , or counter -temporalities exist, and that these other forms of temporal experience and reasoning allow people to interpret their bodily existence and to create and value ways of being that might be invisible to or derogated by the biosciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%