Innovation in Developing and Transition Countries 2017
DOI: 10.4337/9781785369667.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction. A context-specific two-way approach to the study of innovation systems in developing and transition countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis is important because of the different degrees of interest and maturity of regions in innovation systems and the importance of territory and region in innovation systems studies (Freeman, 2002). The discrimination of regions in developed and developing countries has also been analyzed from the perspective of bibliometric studies on innovation systems (Schmutzler et al, 2017;Toivanen & Ponomariov, 2011).…”
Section: Key Elements In National and Regional Innovation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis is important because of the different degrees of interest and maturity of regions in innovation systems and the importance of territory and region in innovation systems studies (Freeman, 2002). The discrimination of regions in developed and developing countries has also been analyzed from the perspective of bibliometric studies on innovation systems (Schmutzler et al, 2017;Toivanen & Ponomariov, 2011).…”
Section: Key Elements In National and Regional Innovation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, the peculiarities of the local contexts should be a central (or, at a minimum, a highly prominent) consideration in the study and application of the systemic approaches (Schmutzler et al., 2017). The focus on the local embeddedness comes in the discussion of the ‘systematic interactions’ that happened in (a bounded) space.…”
Section: Universal (In)applicability and (Non-)tenability Of The Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Previous contributions to this stream of work include two edited books that broaden the geography of the innovation systems debate (Tsvetkova et al, 2017) and explore the linkages between innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems (Tsvetkova et al, 2020). The need to understand the context and to adjust systemic approaches to the local settings in which they are applied is clearly presented by contributions in these books (for summaries, see Schmutzler et al, 2017, 2020). An editorial in the Local Economy journal (Tsvetkova et al, 2019) offers further reflections on the applicability of the systems approaches outside of the Global North. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%