Oral Controlled Release Formulation Design and Drug Delivery 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470640487.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction and Overview of Oral Controlled Release Formulation Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During diffusion studies with a large volume of VSF and SSF (80 mL), there is a difference in the initial rate of diffusion based on the size of the suppositories; however, almost all of the encapsulated TFV diffuses out of the suppositories in 24 h. For dissolution in 80 mL of medium, the higher rates of diffusion in VSF as compared to SSF can be explained by the greater solubility of tenofovir (pK a 3.8 (acidic) and 6.7 (basic)) in a medium of pH 4–6.5 (data not shown). The rate of drug diffusion from a delivery matrix partly depends on the concentration of drug in the saturated layer around the matrix, which depends on the solubility of the drug [ 38 ]; hence, tenofovir diffuses faster out of the carrageenan matrix into VSF as compared to SSF. The release rates in 5 mL of VSF are lower than in 80 mL, due to the saturation of the VSF medium surrounding the suppositories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During diffusion studies with a large volume of VSF and SSF (80 mL), there is a difference in the initial rate of diffusion based on the size of the suppositories; however, almost all of the encapsulated TFV diffuses out of the suppositories in 24 h. For dissolution in 80 mL of medium, the higher rates of diffusion in VSF as compared to SSF can be explained by the greater solubility of tenofovir (pK a 3.8 (acidic) and 6.7 (basic)) in a medium of pH 4–6.5 (data not shown). The rate of drug diffusion from a delivery matrix partly depends on the concentration of drug in the saturated layer around the matrix, which depends on the solubility of the drug [ 38 ]; hence, tenofovir diffuses faster out of the carrageenan matrix into VSF as compared to SSF. The release rates in 5 mL of VSF are lower than in 80 mL, due to the saturation of the VSF medium surrounding the suppositories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean absolute oral bioavailability is ~100%, with no evidence of marked first‐pass metabolism . The exact GI site of perampanel absorption has not been investigated, but based on the rapid absorption, a site in the upper GI tract is likely …”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Of Perampanel In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms used to achieve a controlled release in oral drug delivery systems are based on diverse and complex principles such as dissolution, diffusion, osmosis, swelling, and erosion. The development of push-pull osmotic pump systems and diffusion-or dissolution-controlled monolithic devices or reservoir systems has been widely applied to many extended-release (ER) oral dosage forms 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%