2015
DOI: 10.1080/13533312.2015.1100614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Bosnia and Herzegovina 20 Years after Dayton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 2007 onwards, the period has been characterized by a weak and often incoherent international approach to Bosnia and Herzegovina, failing to move beyond the status quo (cf. Perry 2019; Keil and Perry 2015). Some scholars argued that throughout this time, both the gender blindness of the DPA and the failure of the international bodies to address this adequately resulted in the disadvantaged position of women in the public sphere in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Kennedy et al 2016;Deiana 2018).…”
Section: The Peace Settlement: the Country's Constitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 2007 onwards, the period has been characterized by a weak and often incoherent international approach to Bosnia and Herzegovina, failing to move beyond the status quo (cf. Perry 2019; Keil and Perry 2015). Some scholars argued that throughout this time, both the gender blindness of the DPA and the failure of the international bodies to address this adequately resulted in the disadvantaged position of women in the public sphere in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Kennedy et al 2016;Deiana 2018).…”
Section: The Peace Settlement: the Country's Constitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 An additional complication is the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina have three different laws on political actors and three different standards for both establishment and registration of political parties, depending on the geo-administrative part of the country they are active in, namely The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska or Brcko District(Keil and Perry 2015). One of the interviewees shared her perception of this issue by stating:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The country comprises 4 tiers of governance at the state, entity (two entities and a district), cantons (ten cantons), and municipality levels with separate constitutions, parliaments, governments and judicial powers (Keil and Perry, 2015). This approach resulted in an inefficient multilevel government system, as well as political and legislative structures that encourage institutional fragmentation, widespread corruption and unharmonized social welfare systems (Keil and Perry, 2015).…”
Section: Country Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further fragmentation has been caused by the country's post-war constitution, which established a complex, decentralized system of governance that is partitioned territorially into two ethnic entities, ten cantons, and one district. This has resulted in a large, ethnically divided, and under-resourced public administration system (Keil and Perry 2015), leading to a fragmented and weak social sector that is incapable of tackling BiH's pressing social challenges related to poverty, unemployment, population aging, emigration, social exclusion and inequality (United Nations Population Fund 2020).…”
Section: Contextual Overview: Bosnia and Herzegovinamentioning
confidence: 99%