The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance 2021
DOI: 10.1017/9781108759458.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is needed to understand the direction of the relationships between different compliance mechanisms within our network. Given that the causal relationship of compliance is hard to study in practice (van Rooij & Sokol, 2021 ), experimental approaches that zoom in on specific associations could be utilized to disentangle this. Additionally, longitudinal data could shed some light on how associations in compliance networks may develop over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further research is needed to understand the direction of the relationships between different compliance mechanisms within our network. Given that the causal relationship of compliance is hard to study in practice (van Rooij & Sokol, 2021 ), experimental approaches that zoom in on specific associations could be utilized to disentangle this. Additionally, longitudinal data could shed some light on how associations in compliance networks may develop over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies take an interpretative and endogenous approach, in seeking to understand how behavioral responses to the law shape the meaning of legal rules (Edelman, 1992 ; Edelman & Talesh, 2011 ; Edelman et al, 1991 ; Lange, 2002 ), most studies of compliance seek to understand why people obey or break rules. This latter question has been studied across different academic domains, across different types of rules, and with a focus on different mechanisms and interventions that may shape behavioral responses to legal rules (van Rooij & Sokol, 2021 ). This has resulted in a patchwork of different theories that are seldomly brought together and that exist in compartmentalized silos, each with their own literatures, methods and findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, some conceptualize a distinction between state punitiveness and public or individual punitiveness (Kutateladze, 2010) even though these supply and demand side notions may influence each other. More broadly, the literature on norms is conscious of how institutions are variable in their signaling depending on the actor (van Rooij & Sokol, 2021).…”
Section: Punishment's Purpose and Existing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What can we learn about the complex interplay of influences that shape everyday compliance?) through in-depth conversations with/observations of the people involved in compliance decisions (van Rooij & Sokol, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus a dire need, both in compliance practice and in academia, for an integrated reflection on the various ways to measure and assess compliance. The core goal in both the practical and academic pursuit of compliance is to better understand what mechanisms and processes are at play in shaping organizational responses to legal rules, and what types of intervention have what kind of effect in activating such mechanisms and processes (van Rooij & Sokol, 2021). Yet, to this point there has been little integrated reflection on how the different approaches in assessing compliance fit different practical and academic needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%