Transformation of Education Policy 2010
DOI: 10.1057/9780230281295_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction—Education Policy in Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus, on the one hand, on the institutional opportunities and constraints in the political and education system, reflected by the number of veto players and the degree of centralization (Ganghof 2003;Tsebelis 1995). On the other hand, we incorporate the notion that ideas, norms and identities can also impact reforms, especially in the field of education (see Fearon and Wendt 2002;Nagel, Martens, and Windzio 2010). Thus actors may cling to historically entrenched principles of education despite internal or external pressures for change (see Martens et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus, on the one hand, on the institutional opportunities and constraints in the political and education system, reflected by the number of veto players and the degree of centralization (Ganghof 2003;Tsebelis 1995). On the other hand, we incorporate the notion that ideas, norms and identities can also impact reforms, especially in the field of education (see Fearon and Wendt 2002;Nagel, Martens, and Windzio 2010). Thus actors may cling to historically entrenched principles of education despite internal or external pressures for change (see Martens et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Built on the foundation of the Enlightenment, the German idea of education was based on the ideal of ‘ Bildung ’, which refers to ‘an unfolding of personality through self‐cultivation’ (Lundahl & Waldow, , p. 372) and ‘humanistic character building rather than instrumental ideas of learning for economic life’ (Wiborg, , p. 542). Utilitarian education outcomes were subordinate to personal self‐refinement (Nagel, Martens & Windzio, ). Whilst economic considerations always existed in the interpretation of the education purposes, the humanistic education ideal was a keystone in evaluating education policies and potential reform initiatives.…”
Section: The German Reaction To Pisa In a Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the governmental capacity/political economy (see Wilensky 2002) point of view, the empirical analysis concentrates on the education policymaking processes, the key actors, coalitions and decisions, and the parliamentary debates and negotiations. Germany, with its federal structure of Länder, is characterized by many veto players exhibiting a rather rigid political pattern, while Norway and England have few veto players (Nagel et al 2010). In Norway, the few but powerful veto players imply a culture of bargaining and coalition building, while in England there are few veto players and a winner-takes-all parliamentary system.…”
Section: Path-dependent Implementation Of the European Qualificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education on the one hand has been linked to nation-building processes (Bartolini 2005) and the development of welfare states, and it is seen as a precondition for economic progress. On the other hand, the EU has the extended responsibilities, competencies and ability to recommend that nation states change their education policies (Nagel et al 2010). The overall ambition of this study is to explore the implementation of the EQF in the national settings of Norway, Germany and England, and to identify the explanatory factors of its degree of success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%