Representing Religion in World Cinema 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-10034-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Filmmaking, Mythmaking, Culture Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Media have also become the major sources of their religious imagination (Plate, 2003). -Many social functions of religion have been taken over by media (Barbero, 1997).…”
Section: Results and Discussion The Relationship Between Muslim Schomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Media have also become the major sources of their religious imagination (Plate, 2003). -Many social functions of religion have been taken over by media (Barbero, 1997).…”
Section: Results and Discussion The Relationship Between Muslim Schomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For anthropologists and scholars of religion, transnationalism, and media, Santería practitioners’ experiences with ritual economies and videos do not negate the globalizing (or even commodifying) factors of exchange as a dominant political model; however, they do animate them with new meanings. Media representations, circulation, and consumption sustain culture as much as they are produced by and reproduce it (Evans and Hall ; Hall and du Gay ; Pink ; Plate ). Religious travel and videos draw on Santería ontologies in the shadows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Another way to put the visual in perspective, impossible to pursue here, is to pay more attention to other senses than the eye, in particular the ear and questions of hearing (see also Hirschkind, 2001) and touch (see also Marks, 2000;Verrips, 2006). 10 For example, De Vries (2001); Plate (2003); see also Keane (1997), who makes a similar argument in relation to religious language, which faces the dilemma that transcendence supposedly lies outside of discourse, yet requires being reduced to a discursive form so as to be expressed. 11 Exactly this paradox leads the German Protestant theologian Manfred Josuttis (1999) to a fascinating contemplation, even for non-theologians, of the possibility of speaking about God while at the same time acknowledging Him as a secret (Geheimnis).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than assuming what modern mass media supposedly do to religion once they have been adopted, it is necessary to pay attention to the ways in which religions negotiate new media (see also Hirschkind, 2001; Van de Port, 2006). Far from mistaking the adoption of mass media by religions as an entirely new phenomenon, I suggest that media are intrinsic to religion (De Vries, 2001;Plate, 2003;Stolow, 2005;Van der Veer, 1999). Once religion is approached as a practice of mediation between people and the divine (or more broadly: the realm beyond the empirically perceivable reality), the adoption of modern audiovisual mass media does not appear as entirely new -nor as a fall from unmediated grace -but in terms of a shift from one medium to another, or at least the adoption of a new medium next to old ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%