2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64239-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Gendering the Everyday in the UK House of Commons—Beneath the Spectacle

Abstract: Feminist political scientists are internationally developing conceptual and methodological tools and are making deep empirical excavations, in order to build knowledge about parliaments as gendered workplaces. It is not surprising that this endeavour is growing. Parliaments reproduce the contemporary gender order in their policies, practices, symbols, and leadership. This book focuses on the fascinating institutional arena of the UK House of Commons, drawing on extensive field research conducted in the 2010–20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Political ethnography contains subfields, such as policy ethnography (Shore et al, 2011), parliamentary ethnography (Crewe, 2021) and political party ethnography (Aronoff, 1977;Crewe, 2020;Faucher, 2020). Notably, it can be approached from different ontological and epistemological positions that influence the methods chosen (Schatz, 2009), and the practice of parliamentary ethnographies may change with the type of parliament (Miller, 2021;Adiputri, 2019). Ethnography can be used as part of a standalone approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political ethnography contains subfields, such as policy ethnography (Shore et al, 2011), parliamentary ethnography (Crewe, 2021) and political party ethnography (Aronoff, 1977;Crewe, 2020;Faucher, 2020). Notably, it can be approached from different ontological and epistemological positions that influence the methods chosen (Schatz, 2009), and the practice of parliamentary ethnographies may change with the type of parliament (Miller, 2021;Adiputri, 2019). Ethnography can be used as part of a standalone approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This affected the research practices, which will be explained later in the chapter. Notably, while these three research practices are elucidated, the epistemological impulse towards ethnography as a sensibility (Miller, 2021;Wedeen, 2009) meant that each practice required different degrees of participation.…”
Section: Shadowing Meeting Ethnography and Hanging Outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political ethnography contains subfields, such as policy ethnography (Shore et al, 2011), parliamentary ethnography (Crewe, 2021) and political party ethnography (Aronoff, 1977;Crewe, 2020;Faucher, 2020). Notably, it can be approached from different ontological and epistemological positions that influence the methods chosen (Schatz, 2009), and the practice of parliamentary ethnographies may change with the type of parliament (Miller, 2021;Adiputri, 2019). Ethnography can be used as part of a standalone approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So let us consider these critiques. Palonen is right that ethnographers share an interest in the everyday (Apter, 1987;Ab el es, 1991;Busby, 2013;Crewe, 2015Crewe, , 2021Abram, 2017;Rai and Spray, 2019;Ahmed, 2019;Geddes, 2020;Miller, 2021). For example, Rai's and Spray's subsequent in-depth study of women MPs, based on interviewing, observation and being embedded, is highly ethnographic with its methods and commitment to multi-disciplinarity but above all in their attention to the everyday (2019).…”
Section: Ethnographers' Riffs Rhythms and Ritualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which people self-identify as ethnographers is influenced in part by the disciplinary processes within their discipline. Until recently, despite the occasional and popular ethnographies undertaken political scientists, notably the breathtakingly innovative Home Style by Fenno (1978) and ethnographically informed studies by Puwar (2004), Leston-Bandeira (2016), Rai and Spray (2019) and Prior (2019), as well as self-identified ethnographies by Geddes (2020) and Miller (2021) in the UK alone, political science was dismissive of ethnographic research, or what were assumed to be "microstudies", for their lack of capacity for finding causal links, for inadequate generalising and for their occasional narcissism (see next section for details). Conversely, anthropologists have shown signs of being proprietorial about "ethnography," with reviewers of grant applications complaining that proposed ethnographic studies were insufficiently reflexive or weakened by the absence of an anthropologist [2].…”
Section: An Ethnography Of Ethnographers Of Parliamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%