2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06289-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction. Heirs: Bourdieu, Marx and Ourselves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the Marxian sociological perspective, Bourdieu is interested in the struggle between individuals and social groups, competing to grab resources in terms of economic, cultural, social, symbolic capital, and ultimately to impose, also through the control of the judge supreme, the State (Bourdieu 2012), a vision of the world, a doxa, which legitimizes its domination in the whole of the social space or a specific field. However, the identification of his theoretical framework with the neo-Marxist theory is a patent forcing on which we do not intend to dwell, referring to the many contributions that allow us to dismantle these prejudices and familiarize ourselves with the complexity and depth of his theoretical apparatus (De Feo, Pitzalis, 2015;De Feo et alii 2019;Paolucci 2010Paolucci , 2018Susca 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the Marxian sociological perspective, Bourdieu is interested in the struggle between individuals and social groups, competing to grab resources in terms of economic, cultural, social, symbolic capital, and ultimately to impose, also through the control of the judge supreme, the State (Bourdieu 2012), a vision of the world, a doxa, which legitimizes its domination in the whole of the social space or a specific field. However, the identification of his theoretical framework with the neo-Marxist theory is a patent forcing on which we do not intend to dwell, referring to the many contributions that allow us to dismantle these prejudices and familiarize ourselves with the complexity and depth of his theoretical apparatus (De Feo, Pitzalis, 2015;De Feo et alii 2019;Paolucci 2010Paolucci , 2018Susca 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%