The Net and the Nation State 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316534168.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Internet Governance and the Resilience of the Nation State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, while significant, the role of digital platforms in the everyday reproduction of the world as a world of nations should not be overstated. The preservation of the national structures of the digital environment is also a consequence of the fact that states remain significant actors that delineate the national legal and linguistic frameworks in which these companies and platforms operate (Kohl & Fox, 2017). Second, although digital media inevitably reproduce nationalism in its banal, everyday sense, they do not necessarily foster an exclusive and hegemonic form of nationalism.…”
Section: The Invisible Reproduction Of Nationalism Online: Internet Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, while significant, the role of digital platforms in the everyday reproduction of the world as a world of nations should not be overstated. The preservation of the national structures of the digital environment is also a consequence of the fact that states remain significant actors that delineate the national legal and linguistic frameworks in which these companies and platforms operate (Kohl & Fox, 2017). Second, although digital media inevitably reproduce nationalism in its banal, everyday sense, they do not necessarily foster an exclusive and hegemonic form of nationalism.…”
Section: The Invisible Reproduction Of Nationalism Online: Internet Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Laura DeNardis (2014: 1) argues, ‘the diffuse nature of internet governance technologies is shifting historic control over these public interest areas from traditional nation-state bureaucracy to private ordering and new global institutions’. In the face of such developments, many of states turn into digital monopolies to empower their sovereignty (Bulut, 2016; Everard, 2000; Kohl, 2017; Lu and Liu, 2018; Sunstein, 2017). Today, developing nations such as China, Russia, Iran, and Turkey have adopted policy measures to track the internet economy and advance sophisticated tools, for example, through installing malicious software on the devices of individuals without their consent, organising cyber-attacks, and interfering in the democratic processes of other nations, such as general elections and referenda (Marczak et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Digital Protectionism In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%