2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1474746409990352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Interrogating Harm and Abuse: A Lifespan Approach

Abstract: At any time any person faces a possibility of suffering harm from another, and the broad criminal justice framework aims to provide a general level of protection from such harms to the whole population. However, possibilities of abuse, exploitation or neglect are conceptualised as more likely for certain people. These include those in intimate partner relationships, or those whose level of dependency on others is greater as a result of life stage or impairment. Specific legal and policy measures aim to address… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for this is unclear. Hence the findings of the paper support related work that promotes a comparative and lifespan approach, as one means of interrogating policy and refining its assumptions (Bowes and Daniel, 2010;Daniel and Bowes, 2011;Johnson et al, 2010). Such an approach has implications for all three of the policies discussed; however the focus here has been on ASP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rationale for this is unclear. Hence the findings of the paper support related work that promotes a comparative and lifespan approach, as one means of interrogating policy and refining its assumptions (Bowes and Daniel, 2010;Daniel and Bowes, 2011;Johnson et al, 2010). Such an approach has implications for all three of the policies discussed; however the focus here has been on ASP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, except that it coincides neither with mental incapacity nor with any other label traditionally attached to people by policies and services, the precise nature of the vulnerability understood to affect 'adults at risk' has still not been made clear. Furthermore, the assumptions of predecessor policies, themselves based on patchy empirical foundations, have been built on and refined with remarkably little comparison and cross-fertilisation of ideas from related fields (Bowes and Daniel, 2010;Johnson et al, 2010).…”
Section: 'Adults At Risk' In Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when addressing sexual violence of older women in the context of lifelong IPV, another layer of analysis seems necessary to broaden the perspective on the relationship dynamics within the dyad through the years. Our analysis is underpinned by a life course approach in which aging is viewed not as an age-related vulnerability but as one phase in the entire course of life (Bowes & Daniel, 2010;Braveman, 2014;Elder et al, 2003). This approach focuses on the sociohistorical process of families, couples, and individuals.…”
Section: The Use Of the Life Course Theoretical Framework To Understand The Narratives Of Sexually Abused Older Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%