2015
DOI: 10.1177/1097184x15575109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: Migration scholarship has often lagged behind developments in gender studies. The importance of gender has gained increasing recognition, but this has predominantly meant a focus on women migrants. Only recently has a gendered lens been turned to the study of migrant men. Discourses surrounding migration in law and government, and in legal scholarship, remain characterized by neglect or dismissal of the gendered experiences of male migrants. Where they do appear, men are frequently cast as the oppressor of fam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Odasso demonstrates how both in France and in Belgium, organisations have been established that lobby for more restrictive family migration policies, framing the citizen sponsor as the more vulnerable member in mixed-status families, susceptible to abuse and deception by the migrant partner who is after a residence status and the sponsor's money. De Hart and Besselsen also demonstrate how even those citizen sponsors involved in a long-lasting and stable relationship reproduce the discourse of threatening and abusive male migrants that is part of dominant discourses on migration (Charsley and Wray 2015).…”
Section: The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, Odasso demonstrates how both in France and in Belgium, organisations have been established that lobby for more restrictive family migration policies, framing the citizen sponsor as the more vulnerable member in mixed-status families, susceptible to abuse and deception by the migrant partner who is after a residence status and the sponsor's money. De Hart and Besselsen also demonstrate how even those citizen sponsors involved in a long-lasting and stable relationship reproduce the discourse of threatening and abusive male migrants that is part of dominant discourses on migration (Charsley and Wray 2015).…”
Section: The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 97%
“…On this matter, Charsley and Wray (2015) mentioned the section 3.4 of the Procedural Standards for 38 Refugee Status Determination under United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Mandate (UNHCR, n.d.) which identifies, again, some specific groups of asylum seekers -women who are at particular risk in the host country, elderly asylum seekers, unaccompanied minors and asylum seekers that require medical assistance among others, as 'applicants with special needs'. According to the UNHCR (n.d.) guidelines, these should be prioritized in reception and registration procedures.…”
Section: ! 29mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palabras clave: cosmopolitismo, migración, masculinidad, diáspora, machismo 9(1) 3 istorically taken for granted as the normative subject of migration (Wojnicka & Pustulka, 2017, p. 89), the rise of feminist critique and the growth of masculinities studies have spurred a recent surge in research focusing directly on the life experiences of migrant men and masculinities (Charsley & Wray, 2015;Donaldson, Hibbins, Howson & Pease, 2009;Hearn, 2015). Where Latin Americans are concerned, focusing on notions of machismo, analyses have highlighted narratives of masculine adjustment, resistance or loss as occurring as a result of the "impact" of moving from "traditional" to "modern" gender regimes, often in contrast to relative feminine gain (for critical discussions, see McIlwaine, 2008;Torres, Solberg & Carlstrom, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%