Beyond Ethnicity 2018
DOI: 10.21313/hawaii/9780824869885.003.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: Behind the veneer of Hawai‘i’s myth as a melting pot paradise are complicated and historically rooted cross-racial dynamics. Race, however, has not been the primary paradigm through which Hawai‘i has been understood. Racial inequality is disruptive. It ruptures the image of tolerance, diversity, and happiness...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is prominent in the formal and the other in the informal systems of community life. The first of these cultural codes, identified by the acronym DIE (Domination, Individualism, and Exclusion; Laenui, 1997b), is emblematic of the Americanized social order in the Hawai‘i islands as a multiethnic colony (Baumhofer & Yamane, 2019; Fojas et al, 2018; Fujikane & Okamura, 2008; Irwin & Umemoto, 2016; Kaholokula et al, 2020). Situated in Hawai‘i’s colonial history, American systems in Hawai‘i have been heavily reliant on Dominance (Americans of European descent commonly rejected the idea of non-white Hawaiian rule; see Kamakau, 1992; Kuykendall, 1947), Individualism (where self-promotion is the vehicle of success; self-interest is pursued at the expense of in-group and community welfare; and social prestige is tied to individual material wealth accumulation), and Exclusion (such as suppressing the Hawaiian language; influencing the democratic process by limiting voting rights to property owners and men; excluding Hawaiians from positions of administrative power and bureaucratic authority; and embracing mainstream institutions designed to serve non-Hawaiians)—henceforth referred to as DIE deep culture.…”
Section: Anticolonial Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is prominent in the formal and the other in the informal systems of community life. The first of these cultural codes, identified by the acronym DIE (Domination, Individualism, and Exclusion; Laenui, 1997b), is emblematic of the Americanized social order in the Hawai‘i islands as a multiethnic colony (Baumhofer & Yamane, 2019; Fojas et al, 2018; Fujikane & Okamura, 2008; Irwin & Umemoto, 2016; Kaholokula et al, 2020). Situated in Hawai‘i’s colonial history, American systems in Hawai‘i have been heavily reliant on Dominance (Americans of European descent commonly rejected the idea of non-white Hawaiian rule; see Kamakau, 1992; Kuykendall, 1947), Individualism (where self-promotion is the vehicle of success; self-interest is pursued at the expense of in-group and community welfare; and social prestige is tied to individual material wealth accumulation), and Exclusion (such as suppressing the Hawaiian language; influencing the democratic process by limiting voting rights to property owners and men; excluding Hawaiians from positions of administrative power and bureaucratic authority; and embracing mainstream institutions designed to serve non-Hawaiians)—henceforth referred to as DIE deep culture.…”
Section: Anticolonial Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawaiian communities have attempted to disentangle the cultural strands of DIE choking the life domains of “urban planning and development,” education, health, income and wealth. Political disenfranchisement, acculturation stress, and ethnic marginality are correlates of Hawaiian identity positioned within a lower strata of society beset with indicators (poverty, unemployment) for qualitative distress associated with negative statistics and a higher overall risk burden for mental health problems (Baumhofer & Yamane, 2019; Fojas et al, 2018; Fujikane & Okamura, 2008; Irwin & Umemoto, 2016; Kaholokula et al, 2020). This Hawaiian cultural awakening has underscored questions and implications related to Native Hawaiian self-determination, independence, and sovereignty (Laenui, 1996).…”
Section: Anticolonial Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%