2017
DOI: 10.3167/cja.2017.350203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: This special section explores the various ways in which states of certainty and doubt are generated and sustained, focusing on what we call the 'infrastructures' that undergird, enable or develop alongside them. The articles in this collection build on the growing literature on these topics, notably the very extensive recent work on doubt, uncertainty and opacity, and they extend it further by directing attention not to the consequences of these states or people's responses to them, but instead to the various … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such convictions, however, are the result of the infrastructural work (see Carey and Pedersen 2017) wrought by the positivist background assumptions that are written into our contemporary educational system and, in particular, into our contemporary neoliberal system of research funding. To a certain extent they are likely to be confi rmed for, as I stated above, our fi rst moment of ethnographic encounter is always a second (and a third, and fourth, etc.)…”
Section: Field Aporiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such convictions, however, are the result of the infrastructural work (see Carey and Pedersen 2017) wrought by the positivist background assumptions that are written into our contemporary educational system and, in particular, into our contemporary neoliberal system of research funding. To a certain extent they are likely to be confi rmed for, as I stated above, our fi rst moment of ethnographic encounter is always a second (and a third, and fourth, etc.)…”
Section: Field Aporiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, infrastructures have been researched in different ways. Sometimes infrastructures are visible, empirical objects such as a cross-national pipeline (Barry 2013), sometimes they are information infrastructures (Star & Ruhleder 1996), and yet, other times the concept does not denote some "thing" in the empirical field, an object of analysis, but is put to use as a heuristic device for analysing other phenomena infrastructurally, as when Carey and Pedersen talk about infrastructures of certainty and doubt (Carey & Pedersen 2017).…”
Section: Infrastructure In Science and Technology Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become clear that the infrastructures that produce, channel, or divert drinking or irrigation water stand in a dialectical relationship with social, hierarchized arrangements. They are imbued with “tacit social, political and cultural conventions, which are sometimes quite literally built into their framings” (Carey and Pedersen, 2017). These dialectics are far from stable or predictable, in part because the social contracts and constructs supporting large-scale infrastructure gradually change or disappear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%