2015
DOI: 10.3167/sa.2015.590401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: The aim of this special issue is to bring a critical discussion of affect into debate with the anthropology of the state as a way of working toward a more coherent, ethnographically grounded exploration of affect in political life. We consider how the state becomes a 'social subject' in daily life, attending both to the subjective experience of state power and to the affective intensities through which the state is reproduced in the everyday. We argue that the state should be understood not as a 'fiction' to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationalization of administration through its detachment from emotions ensures impartiality and establishes the legitimate rule of state bureaucracies, according to the Weberian narrative. Until today, the dichotomy of rationality and emotionality persists (Illouz & Finkelman 2009), and affects have been largely disregarded by both political theory (Sauer 1999) and political anthropology (Laszczkowski & Reeves 2015). There are, of course, exceptions: Hochschild's The Managed Heart (1983) has become a canonical work that explores the invasion of rationality into emotional domains, coining the terms 'emotional labour' and 'feeling rules.'…”
Section: The 'Turn To Affect' In Studying the Intersections Of Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationalization of administration through its detachment from emotions ensures impartiality and establishes the legitimate rule of state bureaucracies, according to the Weberian narrative. Until today, the dichotomy of rationality and emotionality persists (Illouz & Finkelman 2009), and affects have been largely disregarded by both political theory (Sauer 1999) and political anthropology (Laszczkowski & Reeves 2015). There are, of course, exceptions: Hochschild's The Managed Heart (1983) has become a canonical work that explores the invasion of rationality into emotional domains, coining the terms 'emotional labour' and 'feeling rules.'…”
Section: The 'Turn To Affect' In Studying the Intersections Of Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes are variously understood in terms of familiarity and comfort (Berlant 1998), spheres of subjectification (Oswin and Olund 2010), extreme emotions (Pain 2009;Pain and Smith 2008), and affective investments in 'regimes of the normal' (Eng, Halberstam, and Esteban Muñoz 2005, 1;Peterson 2014;Wright 2010). A contribution of recent scholarship is the exposition of how emotions and affect are inseparable from political geographies (Navaro-Yashin 2012;Pain 2009;Pain and Staeheli 2014;Peterson 2017) and state governing practices (Harker and Martin 2012;Laszczkowski and Reeves 2015;Oswin and Olund 2010).…”
Section: The Intimate and Geopoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of emotional citizenship refers to how individuals perceive citizenship as a feeling, rather than as a set of rights and duties presented by the state and politically received by the citizen. Directly connecting emotions and the state and arguing that the "affective is the substance of politics", Laszczkowski and Reeves (2015: 2) look at how "affective states" (Stoler, 2007) relate an array of emotions, feelings and affects to state formation, development, continuation, and weakening. Emotional citizenship relies heavily on citizenship as a practice (Wood, 2013), that is, on the daily experience of citizenship (Nyers, 2007).…”
Section: Emotional Citizenship Home and Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%